Proceedings of the 7th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference 2019
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2019-1123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical Monitoring with Seismic Metamaterial Contrast Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These emergent low-frequency properties make MOFs desirable for sound-attenuating applications 10 , including for use as a geophysical contrast agent. We also have demonstrated that rocks saturated with MIL-101(Cr) (NP) 11 nanofluids (~ 0.5 wt%) have distinct elastic and anelastic properties, resulting in decreased seismic wave velocities and amplitudes 12 . These attributes make injectable MOF nanoparticles a potentially disruptive technology for enabling geologic carbon storage and other subsurface energy storage/extraction endeavors.…”
Section: Transport Of Polymer-coated Metal-organic Framework Nanopart...mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These emergent low-frequency properties make MOFs desirable for sound-attenuating applications 10 , including for use as a geophysical contrast agent. We also have demonstrated that rocks saturated with MIL-101(Cr) (NP) 11 nanofluids (~ 0.5 wt%) have distinct elastic and anelastic properties, resulting in decreased seismic wave velocities and amplitudes 12 . These attributes make injectable MOF nanoparticles a potentially disruptive technology for enabling geologic carbon storage and other subsurface energy storage/extraction endeavors.…”
Section: Transport Of Polymer-coated Metal-organic Framework Nanopart...mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As the focus of this paper is to investigate the five different nanoparticles coated with different polymers that differ in surface properties, a study outlining the influence of injected pore volume on transport/retention of nanoparticles with different polymer coatings injected pore volume was not done. Accusand 14 was used as a model geo-substrate for column packing because of its welldefined silica grain size distribution, consistent morphology, relevant mineralogy for sandstone reservoirs 1,12 , and common use in nanoparticle transport studies 15,16 . We determined the percentage of nanoparticles transported by measuring nanoparticle concentrations in the effluent via the UV-Vis method and compared the results with the concentration of pre-injected nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nano uids had a linear ow rate of ~0.30 cm/min and a subsequent 10.5-minute residence time in the column. Accusand 13 was used as a model geo-substrate for column packing due to its well de ned quartz grain size distribution, consistent morphology, and relevant mineralogy for sandstone reservoirs, 1,11 and common use in nanoparticle transport studies. 14,15 Retention of nanoparticles was determined by measuring nanoparticle concentrations in the e uent via ultraviolet-visible spectrometry (UV-Vis) methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also demonstrated that rocks saturated with MIL-101(Cr) 10 nano uids (~0.5 wt%) have distinct elastic and anelastic properties, resulting in decreased seismic wave velocities and amplitudes. 11 These attributes make injectable MOF nanoparticles a potentially disruptive technology for enabling geologic carbon storage and other subsurface energy storage/extraction endeavors. Our ongoing research involves using injectable colloidal MOF nanoparticles as geophysical contrast agents to help track uids and delineate structures in the subsurface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalability of geologic carbon storage is challenged by inadequate insights into detection sensitivity, volumetric distribution, and migration paths of injectates, which are commonly difficult to obtain with conventional geophysical techniques, especially in reservoirs containing complex compartmentalization, layering, and fracture networks. To help track injected fluids and characterize subsurface structures, we have developed water-stable metal–organic framework (MOF) nanoparticle-bearing fluids (nanofluids) that exhibit anomalous low-frequency responses that are desirable for seismic monitoring. , Specifically, rocks saturated with MIL-101­(Cr) nanofluids (∼0.5 wt %) have distinct elastic and inelastic properties, resulting in decreased seismic wave velocities and amplitudes. , Overall, these attributes make injectable MOF nanoparticles a potentially disruptive technology for enabling geologic carbon storage and other sustainable subsurface energy technologies and lends new perspective to the burgeoning field of seismic metamaterials. , In our related work, Miller et al demonstrated for the first time that MOFs are acoustic metamaterials with tunable sound adsorption and resonances. These low-frequency acoustic (<100 Hz, seismic) properties and the injectability of colloidal nano-MOFs are key enabling features of a new class of far-field (reservoir-scale) geophysical contrast agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%