2013
DOI: 10.1029/gm124p0273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical Studies of Marine Gas Hydrate in Northern Cascadia

Abstract: This paper reviews the extensive geophysical studies and Ocean Drilling Project (ODP) results that have provided constraints on the occurrence, distribution, and concentration of gas hydrate and underlying free gas beneath the continental slope of the northern Cascadia subduction zone. On this margin there is a large clastic accretionary sedimentary prism, the most common environment for high concentrations of marine gas hydrates. Most information on the gas hydrate has come from a wide range of seismic survey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies suggest that most of the BSR amplitude is due to the velocity reduction of the underlying free gas (Singh et al, 1993;MacKay et al, 1994;Hyndman et al, 2001;Pecher et al, 2001). The presence of a free-gas zone (FGZ) is an important part of the gas hydrate system, and is particularly important if the presence of gas hydrate is to be…”
Section: Geophysical Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that most of the BSR amplitude is due to the velocity reduction of the underlying free gas (Singh et al, 1993;MacKay et al, 1994;Hyndman et al, 2001;Pecher et al, 2001). The presence of a free-gas zone (FGZ) is an important part of the gas hydrate system, and is particularly important if the presence of gas hydrate is to be…”
Section: Geophysical Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper bound of the gray area corresponds to values of α = 0.77 (zero hydrate at the BSR) and υ = 0.45; the lower bound corresponds to low end values of α = 0.67 (25% bulk hydrate) and υ = 0.41. Point locations: 1, Barents Sea (Andreassen et al, 1990); 2, the norwegian margin (Mienert et al, 2000); 3, Bering Sea basin (Scholl and Hart, 1993); 4, 5, Blake Ridge (Holbrook et al, 1996); 6, Beaufort Sea (Andreassen et al, 1995); 7-9, basin in Makran accretionary prism that has experienced rapid sedimentation (Sain et al, 2000;Grevemeyer et al, 2000); 10, offshore Cascadia (Hyndman et al, 2001); 11, offshore Chile (Bangs et al, 1993;Miller, et al, 1996), niger delta (Hovland et al, 1997); 13, 15, offshore Colombia (Minshull et al, 1994); 14, Gulf of Oman anticline (Minshull and White, 1989); 16, offshore Peru (Pecher et al, 1996); 17, South Shetland islands (Tinivella et al, 1998); 18, 19, Oman accretionary toe (White, 1979). Top inset, model of the hydrate stability zone and critically thick FGZ below for a bottom water temperature of 0°C.…”
Section: Geological Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical calculations of the dissociation pressure in the temperature range of 273-293 (K) and water salinity in the range of 0-70, have been accomplished by the research group of Duan et al [10][11][12]. Hydrate saturation values for the Malik 2L-38 site at the arctic Mackenzie Delta have been reported to be 35-40% and at Northern Cascadia Margin confirmed to be 20-25% [13]. In one report by Colett et al, hydrate saturation in some cases exceeds 80% [14].…”
Section: Methane Hydrate Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%