Fluvial Remote Sensing for Science and Management 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781119940791.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geosalar: Innovative Remote Sensing Methods for Spatially Continuous Mapping of Fluvial Habitat at Riverscape Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods are time consuming, labour intensive, provide limited spatial extent (Winterbottom and Gilvear, 1997;Feurer et al, 2008;Bangen et al, 2014) and do not provide the continuous spatial coverage needed to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of the 'riverscape' (Westaway et al, 2001;Marcus, 2012). This 'riverscape' perspective is gaining increasing support within river science and management (Fernandez et al, 2011;Bergeron and Carbonneau, 2012;Carbonneau et al, 2012) and precipitates a need for different ways of quantifying fluvial topography.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these methods are time consuming, labour intensive, provide limited spatial extent (Winterbottom and Gilvear, 1997;Feurer et al, 2008;Bangen et al, 2014) and do not provide the continuous spatial coverage needed to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of the 'riverscape' (Westaway et al, 2001;Marcus, 2012). This 'riverscape' perspective is gaining increasing support within river science and management (Fernandez et al, 2011;Bergeron and Carbonneau, 2012;Carbonneau et al, 2012) and precipitates a need for different ways of quantifying fluvial topography.…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, data collection is time-consuming and labour intensive and results are site and image specific. Results are also known to be adversely affected by variations in scene illumination, substrate, turbidity and water surface roughness (Winterbottom and Gilvear, 1997;Westaway et al, 2003;Legleiter et al, 2004;Carbonneau et al, 2006;Lejot et al, 2007;Legleiter et al, 2009;Bergeron and Carbonneau, 2012;Legleiter, 2012). The maximum water depth limit achieved using spectral-depth approaches is reported to be up to 1 m (Legleiter et al, 2004(Legleiter et al, , 2009Carbonneau et al, 2006;Legleiter, 2012).…”
Section: Spectral-depth Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() also review the advances in the use of remote sensed data to characterize fluvial hydromorphology concluding that such data could benefit the Water Framework Directive assessment process across Europe. Ecohydraulic information has also been derived from satellite survey of channel bathymetry and sedimentology and subsequent modelling using these data have facilitated fish habitat assessment at the river scale (Bergeron and Carbonneau, ). Of particular note is the increasing availability of Landsat data and Google Earth engine imagery which is now providing unprecedented information on land‐surface changes.…”
Section: Recent Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spectral-depth remote sensing is generally applied only to rivers with a depth of less than 1-1.5 m (Legleiter et al 2004;Carbonneau et al 2006;Legleiter 2012) because of the limited penetration depth of natural light. Moreover, reflectance-depth relationships are affected by substrate type, water surface roughness, and water column optical properties (Winterbottom and Gilvear 1997;Lejot et al 2007;Legleiter et al 2009;Bergeron and Carbonneau 2012;Legleiter 2014). The assessment of the potential of these methods would require flights at a sufficient height to capture each water body in one single picture (i.e.…”
Section: Bathymetry Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%