We propose a methodology for identifying and prioritizing
the best
potential locations for brine concentration facilities in the contiguous
United States. The methodology uses a geographic information system
and multicriteria decision analysis (GIS-MCDA) to prioritize the potential
locations for brine concentration facilities based on thermodynamic,
economic, environmental, and social criteria. By integrating geospatial
data with a computational simulation of a real brine concentration
system, an objective weighting method identifies the weights for 13
subcriteria associated with the main criteria. When considering multiple
dimensions for decision making, brine concentration facilities centered
in Florida were consistently selected as the best location, due to
the high second-law efficiency, low transportation cost, and high
capacity for supplying municipal water needs to nearby populations.
For inland locations, Southeast Texas outperforms all other locations
for thermodynamic, economic, and environmental priority cases. A sensitivity
analysis evaluates the consistency of the results as the priority
of a main criterion varies relative to other decision-making criteria.
Focusing on a single subcriterion misleads decision making when identifying
the best location for brine concentration systems, identifying the
importance of the multicriteria methodology.