2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical modeling of the geological uncertainty in an iron ore deposit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the relationship between the grades, granulometry, and rock types ( [25], but these transformations are not suitable for variables that can take zero values, as is the case in the present case study. We therefore opt for a ratio transformation that does not use logarithms, as proposed in [10], where the quantitative variables are successively normalised by the residual of the closure:…”
Section: Modelling and Simulation Of Quantitative Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the relationship between the grades, granulometry, and rock types ( [25], but these transformations are not suitable for variables that can take zero values, as is the case in the present case study. We therefore opt for a ratio transformation that does not use logarithms, as proposed in [10], where the quantitative variables are successively normalised by the residual of the closure:…”
Section: Modelling and Simulation Of Quantitative Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hierarchical workflow accounts for geological controls on the distributions of the quantitative variables but produces clear-cut discontinuities in the values of the quantitative variables when crossing the domain boundaries [5,6]. Several alternatives have been proposed to mitigate these discontinuities and to account for spatial correlation across the domain boundaries [6][7][8][9][10]. Another approach to produce gradual transitions near the domain boundaries is to model the quantitative variables of interest with no previous geological domaining by considering the controlling rock types or ore types as cross-correlated covariates [11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the compositional nature of the indicator random fields, the sum of the indicator cross-variograms γ k,k for k = k is equal to the opposite of the indicator direct variogram γ k , which can be demonstrated using Equations (5) and (12):…”
Section: Link Between Indicator Direct and Cross-variogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying and modeling rock type, mineralization and alteration domains in ore deposits has become a crucial step in the assessment of geological and geometallurgical regionalized variables, such as metal grades or metal recoveries, due to the controls that these domains often exert on the distribution of these variables [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many varieties of geological models generated from different modeling methods and geologists (Soubeyrand 2017; Mery et al 2017). Geological modeling often refers to raster-based or vector -based models, both of which have its own features and applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%