2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical and kinematic parameters affecting the coefficients of restitution for rock fall analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, impact velocity should be greater, which is possible if the launch velocity of the previous impact was higher than the assumed minimum. For the cases where V cor < 1, it is observed that kinematic COR ranges between 0.55 and 1.0 and presents smaller variation compared to the normal or tangential coefficient of restitution, similar to what was previously reported in the relevant literature (i.e., Asteriou et al, 2012;Asteriou and Tsiambaos, 2016).…”
Section: Coefficients Of Restitutionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, impact velocity should be greater, which is possible if the launch velocity of the previous impact was higher than the assumed minimum. For the cases where V cor < 1, it is observed that kinematic COR ranges between 0.55 and 1.0 and presents smaller variation compared to the normal or tangential coefficient of restitution, similar to what was previously reported in the relevant literature (i.e., Asteriou et al, 2012;Asteriou and Tsiambaos, 2016).…”
Section: Coefficients Of Restitutionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…12, the normal COR increases as the impact angle reduces, similarly to previous observations by Giacomini et al (2012), Asteriou et al (2012) and Wyllie (2014). The correlation proposed by Wyllie (2014) is also plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Coefficients Of Restitutionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kinematic COR values are less affected by the rebound angle. In general, the kinematic COR is more appropriate than the normal COR for use in correlations as it provides more consistent trends (Asteriou et al 2012).…”
Section: Effect Of Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rockfall mass was determined by the statistical analysis method. The coefficients of restitution and friction are affected by slope shape, surface vegetation and block shape [35,36], which can be obtained by four methods including in situ tests [37], back analysis [38], theoretical estimation [39,40] and literature query [41]. Because of the impossibility to perform in situ tests and a lack of some historical events records for back analysis and theoretical estimation, the first three methods are not suitable for this study.…”
Section: Rockfall Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%