2017
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-16-00037.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geriatrics Curricula for Internal and Family Medicine Residents: Assessing Study Quality and Learning Outcomes

Abstract: Background Prior reviews of geriatrics curricula for internal medicine (IM) and family medicine (FM) residents have not evaluated study quality or assessed learning objectives or specific IM or FM competencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(133 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consensus guidelines for content in geriatrics skills, knowledge, and behaviors for internal medicine residents have been published; twenty-six minimum geriatrics competencies (MGCs) for IM/family medicine (FM) residents were developed in agreement with ACGME core clinical competencies [ 3 ]. However, most published geriatrics curricula address a limited number of MGCs [ 4 ], or are comprehensive programs requiring significant faculty development and additional funding [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Frequently reported outcomes assessments were Kirkpatrick levels 2a and 2b in knowledge and attitudes [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consensus guidelines for content in geriatrics skills, knowledge, and behaviors for internal medicine residents have been published; twenty-six minimum geriatrics competencies (MGCs) for IM/family medicine (FM) residents were developed in agreement with ACGME core clinical competencies [ 3 ]. However, most published geriatrics curricula address a limited number of MGCs [ 4 ], or are comprehensive programs requiring significant faculty development and additional funding [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Frequently reported outcomes assessments were Kirkpatrick levels 2a and 2b in knowledge and attitudes [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most published geriatrics curricula address a limited number of MGCs [ 4 ], or are comprehensive programs requiring significant faculty development and additional funding [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Frequently reported outcomes assessments were Kirkpatrick levels 2a and 2b in knowledge and attitudes [ 4 ]. Residency programs should use training strategies that are outcomes based, directly assessing professional skills and behaviors, i.e., Kirkpatrick levels 3 and 4 [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of geriatric fellowship-trained physicians (geriatricians), who provide appropriate care for older adults, is not expected to meet the needs of a growing aging population. As a result, many older adults will rely on general physicians for their care 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older adults account for more than one-third of annual visits to primary care physicians and subspecialists, many of whom lack formal geriatrics training. [1][2][3][4] Polypharmacy, commonly defined as the use of five or more medications, is increasing among older adults (from 31% in 2006 to 36% in 2011) 5 and is a proven predictor of prescribing problems. These problems include inappropriately dosed medications, drug-drug interactions, and drug-disease interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Many organizations have unilaterally attempted to modify physician education and the health care system to respond to the growing number of older patients. 1,2,[9][10][11][12][13] Despite these efforts, most trainees and practitioners remain less confident in their ability to care for older adults with complex medical conditions and polypharmacy. 3,9,11,12,14 The American Geriatrics Society (AGS), 15 Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 16 and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 17 recommend medication reconciliation as a best practice in patient care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%