2015
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gerlumph Data Release 2:2.5 Billion Simulated Microlensing Light Curves

Abstract: In the upcoming synoptic all-sky survey era of astronomy, thousands of new multiply imaged quasars are expected to be discovered and monitored regularly. Light curves from the images of gravitationally lensed quasars are further affected by superimposed variability due to microlensing. In order to disentangle the microlensing from the intrinsic variability of the light curves, the time delays between the multiple images have to be accurately measured. The resulting microlensing light curves can then be analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To calculate microlensed light curves, we use the emitted specific intensity I λ,e (t, p) at the source plane calculated via ARTIS for a given SN model, where I λ,e (t, p) is a function of wavelength λ, time since explosion t, and impact parameter p, which is the projected distance from the ejecta center. We combine I λ,e (t, p) with magnification maps from GERLUMPH (Vernardos et al 2015;Chan, in prep. ), which uses the inverse ray-shooting technique (e.g., Kayser et al 1986;Wambsganss et al 1992;Vernardos & Fluke 2013) yielding the magnification factor µ(x, y) as a function of cartesian coordinates x and y on the source plane 2 .…”
Section: Microlensing On Sne Iamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate microlensed light curves, we use the emitted specific intensity I λ,e (t, p) at the source plane calculated via ARTIS for a given SN model, where I λ,e (t, p) is a function of wavelength λ, time since explosion t, and impact parameter p, which is the projected distance from the ejecta center. We combine I λ,e (t, p) with magnification maps from GERLUMPH (Vernardos et al 2015;Chan, in prep. ), which uses the inverse ray-shooting technique (e.g., Kayser et al 1986;Wambsganss et al 1992;Vernardos & Fluke 2013) yielding the magnification factor µ(x, y) as a function of cartesian coordinates x and y on the source plane 2 .…”
Section: Microlensing On Sne Iamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the emitted specific intensity, I λ,e (t, x, y), is multiplied with the microlensing magnification map 4 µ(x, y) from GERLUMPH (Vernardos et al 2015;Chan et al 2020) and integrated over the whole size of the projected SN Ia. The specific intensity I λ,e (t, x, y) depends on the time since explosion t, the wavelength λ, and the radial coordinate on the source plane p = x 2 + y 2 , given our spherical averaging of the photon packets from the models 5 .…”
Section: Microlensing Formalism and Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to conservation of energy, microlensing by stars does not change the average magnification over an ensemble, but it can introduce significant scatter (Dobler & Keeton 2006;Foxley-Marrable et al 2018;Goldstein et al 2018). We use the microlensing magnification distributions from Vernardos et al (2014Vernardos et al ( , 2015 to build the probability density function for microlensing magnification. For simplicity sake, we assume all trailing images go through the region star field where 80 per cent of the mass is in stars and 20 per cent in a smooth (dark matter) component.…”
Section: Type Iip Shock Breakoutmentioning
confidence: 99%