2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

German validation of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) II: Reliability, validity, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity

Abstract: The reported results confirm our previous study and show that the German CAARS-S/O do indeed represent a reliable and cross-culturally valid measure of current ADHD symptoms in adults.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
63
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…CAARS subscale T scores were significantly and positively associated with degree of depression and eating-related psychopathology. This is in line with all other studies on this topic and is thought to reflect the high degree of comorbid problems in adults with ADHD [23,45]. However, an alternative explanation might be that comorbid conditions may produce symptoms which may erroneously be diagnosed as ADHD, since symptoms associated with ADHD are also present in a number of other mental disorders [15,46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CAARS subscale T scores were significantly and positively associated with degree of depression and eating-related psychopathology. This is in line with all other studies on this topic and is thought to reflect the high degree of comorbid problems in adults with ADHD [23,45]. However, an alternative explanation might be that comorbid conditions may produce symptoms which may erroneously be diagnosed as ADHD, since symptoms associated with ADHD are also present in a number of other mental disorders [15,46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…As with the long version, the ADHD Index (Cronbach's α = 0.843) is incorporated on this form. The German version of the long form (42 items) was validated by Christiansen et al [22,23,26] and has shown to have good psychometric properties. The raw scale scores were transformed into standard T scores which were derived from the German normative data [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scale consists of 66 items, which are used to assess eight subscales. A validation of the German version by Christiansen et al (2012) found high internal consistency for the subscales (Cronbach's a between .74 and .95). They also reported a high stability of the selfrating form: Test-rest reliability ranged from r = .85 to .92.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This self-report scale consists of 25 items which are answered on a five-point Likert scale (0 = “not applicable” to 4 = “applicable”). For the assessment of ADHD symptoms in adulthood 2) the ADHD-Self-Rating scale (ADHD-RS; [56]) and 3) the Connor Adult ADHD Rating Scale - Self-Report: Long Version (CAARS-S:L; [57]) were used. Both scales are based on the DSM-IV criteria for ADHD [58].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%