2001
DOI: 10.3790/vjh.70.1.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

German Wage Underpayment: An Investigation into Labor Market Inefficiency and Discrimination

Abstract: Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when many employers are present in a labor market, the other factors may mean that individual workers face "few employment opportunities," because of the costs of locating vacancies or traveling to distant locations, which means that labor markets are effectively "thin" (Manning 2003a: 106-108). Much of the evidence of monopsony power has been indirect, involving aspects of wage dispersion, the finance of work-based training, pay differences by race and sex, and the effects of changes in statutory minimum wages (e.g., Card and Krueger 1995;Dawson, Hinks, and Watson 2001;Bhaskar, Manning, and To 2002;Dube, Lester, andReich 2010, 2012). Recent research has focused on more direct evidence, in terms of the elasticity of labor supply to individual firms (e.g., Ransom and Sims 2010;Staiger, Spetz, and Phibbs 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when many employers are present in a labor market, the other factors may mean that individual workers face "few employment opportunities," because of the costs of locating vacancies or traveling to distant locations, which means that labor markets are effectively "thin" (Manning 2003a: 106-108). Much of the evidence of monopsony power has been indirect, involving aspects of wage dispersion, the finance of work-based training, pay differences by race and sex, and the effects of changes in statutory minimum wages (e.g., Card and Krueger 1995;Dawson, Hinks, and Watson 2001;Bhaskar, Manning, and To 2002;Dube, Lester, andReich 2010, 2012). Recent research has focused on more direct evidence, in terms of the elasticity of labor supply to individual firms (e.g., Ransom and Sims 2010;Staiger, Spetz, and Phibbs 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the afore-mentioned job search inefficiencies, the aspect which appears to have attracted the greatest wave of studies is the pay gap caused by differences in race, gender, nationality, demographic/ socio-economic status and education. In an international context, some pioneering papers using stochastic frontier analysis to highlight this issue include papers by Robinson and Wunnava (1989), Hunt-McCool and Warren (1993), Croppenstedt and Meschi (1997), Polachek and Robst (1998), Dawson et al (2001), Salas and Contreras (2003), Lang (2005), Adamchik and King (2007) or Jensen et al (2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McClure et al (1998) also take up the question of wage inefficiency but compare Stochastic Frontier estimations for the United States and Canada. Dawson et al (2001) analyze the question of relative underpayments to male and female workers. Prieto et al (2003) use the Stochastic Frontier wage model to estimate returns to education for potential and effective wages.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%