Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania

Koch, Peter; Oesterreicher, Wulf

doi:10.1515/9783111372914

Cited by 183 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Otro aspecto discutido en la bibliografía semántica, en el que no nos detendremos pero que creemos necesario mencionar al menos, es la relación entre los tres tipos de variación, que ha llevado a autores como Coseriu a hablar de relación orientada (de forma que un dialecto puede funcionar en una comunidad como nivel de lengua y un nivel puede funcionar como estilo de lengua pero nunca en el sentido contrario) y a utilizar el concepto de lengua funcional como técnica de discurso sintópica, sinstrática y sinfásica, que incide en la idea de que los tres tipos de variación se dan de manera simultánea en el discurso concreto. La citada concepción en lo que respecta a la relación entre los tipos de variación es la idea que subyace al modelo de la cadena de variedades desarrollado en la semántica de autores como Koch y Oesterreicher (1985y 1990. Para una visión más completa de la perspectiva coseriana y de la escuela germánica más actual, ver Casas Gómez (2016) (vulgar).…”

Section: Tipología De La Variación Y Análisis Sociolingüístico Del Léunclassified

Semántica léxica y sociolingüística variacionista: las marcas sociolingüísticas en la descripción semántica del léxico

Morera

2017

Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Tipología De La Variación Y Análisis Sociolingüístico Del Léunclassified

Semántica léxica y sociolingüística variacionista: las marcas sociolingüísticas en la descripción semántica del léxico

Morera

2017

Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The traditional dichotomy between spoken and written modes of discourse shows evidential limits in the linguistic study of a period such as the 17th century, from which unfortunately we have only access to written testimonies. This bipartite distinction-spoken versus written modes-needs to be complemented with a more nuanced view that considers the existence of a stylistic continuum between a formal and an informal way of communication or between a pole of 'communicative distance' and another pole of 'communicative proximity' as Koch and Oesterreicher (1990) state.…”

Section: Theoretical Framework Oral Discourse Versus Written Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

“…This author opened a line of research or at least an idea that has been mentioned and developed by different authors (c.f. for example, Fuentes Rodríguez 1987, Koch and Oesterreicher 1990, Martín Zorraquino and Portolés Lázaro 1999and López Serena and Borreguero Zuloaga 2010.…”

Section: Theoretical Framework Oral Discourse Versus Written Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Once the discourse structure is not only considered from the perspective of variation between the strict dichotomy of spoken and written modes, but also from the perspective of variation on a continuum from formal to informal ways of communicating (Koch and Oesterreicher 1990), it is possible to analyse the different discourse structures that can be found in a stylistic continuum.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Role of Discourse Markers in the Variational Axis ‘Oral-Written Discourse’ in 17th-Century Colonial Documents

Areta

2015

Neophilologus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research is to analyse the role of a paradigm of discourse markers-the consecutive connectors-in the Spanish of 17th-century colonial documents. We intend to show how their variation in the stylistic continuum is due to the different communicative situations in which they can be produced. The methodology and approaches considered comprise the oral and written variational axis, the grammaticalisation process as a linguistic change and the traditional dichotomy between the semasiological and onomasiological perspectives. The analysis of discourse markers is restricted to three units: y así, por lo qual and conque, chosen because of the different uses that they show in a corpus composed of 22 cartas oficiales (official letters) and 22 informaciones de oficio y parte (informations pertaining to service to the Spanish kingdom) from the districts governed by the audience of Quito.

show abstract

“…This case is special, because, according to the "elective affinities" between written and spoken language, immediacy tends to be realised in the phonic medium (cf. Koch and Oesterreicher 1990). The analysis of vocatives shows that "orality" in the graphic medium undergoes important transformations compared to "original" orality in the phonic medium.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of Taavitsainen, Härmä & Korhonen (2006): Dialogic Language Use / Dimensions du dialogisme / Dialogischer Sprachgebrauch

Schrott

2010

JHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Language Use / Dimensions du dialogisme / Dialogischer Sprachgebrauch. (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki, tome LXVI.) 2006. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique. ISBN 951-9040-22-6. 454 pp. Reviewed by Angela Schrott (University of Kassel)Combining a selection of papers given at the symposium on Dialogic Language Use: Address in Focus held at the University of Helsinki in 2004, the volume represents the enormous diversity characteristic of current research on dialogic interactions. In fact, openness and variety are programmatic for the volume that gathers 26 contributions dealing with dialogic language use in different languages, cultures and time periods. The broad definition of "dialogic language use" as "textual interaction between text participants" (p. 1) allows for two different interpretations of "dialogue": as conversational interaction and as the dialogicity of language in general. Moreover, the volume not only brings together current research projects on dialogic interaction in different languages (focusing on English, German, and French) but also combines the different traditions that characterise English, German, and Romance philology in the fields of pragmatics and dialogue analysis. Thus, French linguists following Benveniste (1966) emphasise the parameters of "coénonciation" and "(inter)subjectivité", pointing out the general dialogicity of language; German scholars tend to concentrate on textual genres and dialogue forms; and studies on English are strongly influenced by modern corpus linguistics. In order to allow a more detailed presentation of the different research projects and their methodologies, a representative choice of articles will be discussed in this review.The contributions in the first part, "Focus on Theories and Methods", deal mostly with historical and diachronic issues where research on dialogic interaction raises particularly complex methodological questions (key-words would be the "simulation" of orality and the "authenticity" of spoken language in written texts). The introductory article by Horst J. Simon ("Reconstructing historical orality in German -What sources should we use?", pp. 7-26) discusses sources that may permit at least a partial reconstruction of historical spoken language. According to Simon, what "good" sources have in common is that they represent -for different reasons -communicative immediacy (pp. 9-10). The article highlights model dialogues in early foreign-language textbooks and chooses a textbook written in Venice in 1424 (authored by Georg von Nürnberg) for a close philological analysis. The model dialogues in German and Italian represent bargaining

show abstract

Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania

Cited by 183 publications

References 0 publications

Semántica léxica y sociolingüística variacionista: las marcas sociolingüísticas en la descripción semántica del léxico

Semántica léxica y sociolingüística variacionista: las marcas sociolingüísticas en la descripción semántica del léxico

The Role of Discourse Markers in the Variational Axis ‘Oral-Written Discourse’ in 17th-Century Colonial Documents

Review of Taavitsainen, Härmä & Korhonen (2006): Dialogic Language Use / Dimensions du dialogisme / Dialogischer Sprachgebrauch

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About