2017
DOI: 10.1080/19463014.2016.1275028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gesture, meaning, and thinking-for-teaching in unplanned vocabulary explanations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This consistent usage of materials appeared to sensitize students to its presence and develop students’ awareness and perception of such materials use in the classroom. Furthermore, L2 teachers should be aware of the roles of nonverbal resources (e.g., cut‐off, silence, gesture, and gaze) in thinking for teaching (Smotrova, ; van Compernolle & Smotrova, ) when they need to change material modes when reacting to students’ state of understanding. Excerpt 2 demonstrated how Teacher L effectively employed verbal and nonverbal resources in order to create space to think about appropriate materials in context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This consistent usage of materials appeared to sensitize students to its presence and develop students’ awareness and perception of such materials use in the classroom. Furthermore, L2 teachers should be aware of the roles of nonverbal resources (e.g., cut‐off, silence, gesture, and gaze) in thinking for teaching (Smotrova, ; van Compernolle & Smotrova, ) when they need to change material modes when reacting to students’ state of understanding. Excerpt 2 demonstrated how Teacher L effectively employed verbal and nonverbal resources in order to create space to think about appropriate materials in context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that “okay” marks a topic closing or shift (e.g., Beach, ) along with a cut‐off (“it‐”). Teacher L's turn (lines 47–52) displays the emerging process of her in‐flight pedagogical decision, associated with what Smotrova () and van Compernolle and Smotrova () called thinking for teaching . Thinking for teaching is defined as “teachers’ moment‐to‐moment instructional decisions in the classroom” (van Compernolle & Smotrova, , p. 2), which are often enacted through the gesture–speech interface.…”
Section: Analyzing Materials Moments In Multilingual Classroom Interacmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seedhouse 2010) to the ways in which embodied movements perform classroom actions (e.g. van Compernolle and Smotrova 2017). Such research provides important empirical observations and pedagogical suggestions, including notably the work in teacher education and classroom discourse (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important finding is the ways this directive format downplays the relevance of a conflict source, as well as orients more towards teaching students self-restraint than towards using reprimand and punishment. The paper adds on to the growing body of research in resolving peer disputes (Church 2012;Church, Mashford-Scott, and Cohrssen 2017) and conflict resolution in educational settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%