Getting Ahead in Singapore: How Neighborhoods, Gender, and Ethnicity Affect Enrollment into Elite Schools

Abstract

Is education the social leveler it promises to be? Nowhere is this question better addressed than in Singapore, the emblematic modern-day meritocracy where education has long been hailed as the most important ticket to elite status. In particular, what accounts for gender and ethnic gaps in enrollment into Singapore's elite junior colleges-the key sorters in the country's education system? We consider how the wealth of neighborhoods has combined with the elite status of schools to affect the social mobility of gender and ethnic groups. Analyzing data from 40 years of junior college yearbooks (1971-2010), we find persistent differences in educational opportunity. Women and Malays have historically experienced inequality in Singapore, and their student routes to becoming elites differ markedly. For female students, attending an elite junior college in a wealthy neighborhood is associated with wealthy neighborhoods that have a disproportionate number of elite girls' secondary schools that feed into the junior colleges. By contrast, for Malays, not attending an elite junior college in a wealthy neighborhood has more to do with wealthy neighborhoods underrepresenting Malays in demographic composition. Elite families thus now include better educated women as well as men, yet Malays still rarely become better educated elites. These results underscore the need to carefully map the complex associations and mechanisms between gender and ethnic categorizations, the status of schools, and the characteristics of neighborhoods.

Educational inequality and state-sponsored elite education: the case of the Dutch gymnasium

“…For instance, many of the most selective universities in the UK have a disproportionately large intake of pupils who have attended elite private schools (Bourdieu 1989;Barnes 2018;Boliver 2013). Expensive and selective New England boarding schools arguably serve a similar function for access to the Ivy League (Cookson and Persell 2008;Nunes 2015), as do elite schools more generally across the world (Chua, Swee, and Wellman 2019;Maxwell and Aggelton 2015;Rizvi 2014). For these and other reasons many routinely express disapproval of expensive and selective private schools.…”

The Adherence of Singaporean Students in Different Educational Institutions to National Food-Based Dietary Guidelines

“…Students attending this institution tend to start and end the school day earlier compared to the Polytechnic and ITE students. This could be driven by confounding factors like socio-economic status linked to educational attainment [ 64 , 65 ] that have not been collected within the current study. It is also unclear whether on-campus food provision was a major driver for more or less positive dietary habits.…”

Deservedness, humbleness and chance: conceptualisations of luck and academic success among Singaporean elite students

“…For instance, Ong and Cheung (2016), based on a large-scale interview study of children's aspirations, show that students who are enrolled in elite secondary schools are more likely to live in private housing, have at least one parent with a university degree, and a combined household income that is above the threshold for the middleclass majority in Singapore (SGD 10,000). Chua et al (2019), found that persistent differences in routes to elite schools located in wealthy neighbourhoods vary by attributes such as gender and ethnicity. It is therefore not unrealistic to claim with some level of certainty that elite school enrolment is stratified and skewed towards the upper-middle and upper classes in Singapore.…”