We need to break away from intensive agriculture based on non-renewable and toxic inputs. Safer practices are indeed emerging. Sustainable agriculture started about 50 years ago with the design of integrated pest management (IPM) to counteract pesticide misuse and abuse. Ecological intensifi cation emerged only a few years ago. Here we review the literature to compare ecological intensifi cation and IPM, from the point of view of crop protection. We present also agroecology and organic farming. Neither ecological intensifi cation nor IPM have philosophical bases such as agroecology, or to an even larger extent, biodynamic agriculture. Ecological intensifi cation, IPM and agroecology are polysemous, fl exible and pragmatic approaches, whereas organic farming is well-defi ned by its scope and standards. Ecological intensifi cation, in explicitly pursuing the goal of increasing food production to feed the planet, differs from agroecology, whose proponents think that the view that world hunger will be solved by merely increasing yield is an oversimplifi cation. In terms of cropping system design, in its actual practice, IPM often remains based on methods that increase the effi ciency of chemical pesticide use. Or, along with organic agriculture, it may remain based on substitution of pesticides by less harmful alternatives. In contrast, ecologically intensive crop protection usually requires cropping system redesign.In terms of ecosystem service provision, IPM tends to focus on the pest-pathogen regulation service. In contrast, both ecological intensifi cation and agroecology pay attention to both practices which were designed for crop protection and biomass provision purposes, as well as practices with broader scope, primarily designed to offer other ecosystem services which are found to have indirect effects on crop
Ecological Intensifi cation for Crop Protection Alain Ratnadass and Marco BarzmanA. Ratnadass (*) UR HortSys, CIRAD , Boulevard de la Lironde , F-34398 Montpellier , France e-mail: alain.ratnadass@cirad.fr M. Barzman Eco-Innov, INRA , F-78850 Thiverval-Grignon , France e-mail: Marco.Barzman@grignon.inra.fr 54 protection. This chapter also describes selected tropical case studies of crop protection, such as upland rice seed-dressing and fruit fl y control in orchards, to compare and contrast crop protection in these contexts. Finally, we propose to consider IPM and ecologically intensive crop protection as complementary rather than confl icting approaches. The concept of "ultimate IPM" brings IPM closer to ecologically intensive crop protection. This new approach involves starting from a nearly natural ecosystem to which inputs are gradually added when absolutely necessary, rather than starting from a conventional agroecosystem and gradually remove inputs from it.
Keywords