2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13347-011-0050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ghosts in the Machine: Do the Dead Live on in Facebook?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mitchell et al (2012) explain this phenomenon as a result of the unique affordances of online technologies, in which the deceased may appear almost as if still alive, and they do subsequently warn against over usage of online memorials. Similarly, Stokes (2012) uses Floridian (2013 ethics to show that such data deserves to be treated as a moral patient in itself.…”
Section: Social Media Users As Micro Celebritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mitchell et al (2012) explain this phenomenon as a result of the unique affordances of online technologies, in which the deceased may appear almost as if still alive, and they do subsequently warn against over usage of online memorials. Similarly, Stokes (2012) uses Floridian (2013 ethics to show that such data deserves to be treated as a moral patient in itself.…”
Section: Social Media Users As Micro Celebritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, they merely account for the role of technology and have thus left economics and ethics relatively unexplored. At the same time, purely ethical viewpoints (Stokes 2012;Wright 2014), although enlightening, often fail to situate the matter within a larger economic and political context. As a result, current research on digital afterlife tends to neglect the fact that the online presence of the dead is generally mediated by commercial platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process by which people from various social contexts such as school, work, and the family are all collapsed into the equal context of "friends" and where the social distances between various connections are lost is called "context collapse" (Marwick & Ellison, 2012; Vitak, Lampe, Gray, & Ellision, 2012). As a result, communal reaction has also become a bit more clichéd and aggregative, where people rely on trite posts such as "Sorry for your loss" or "Rest in peace" (Robinson, 1998 Stokes, 2012) it is unclear how these posts are perceived by others, especially the nongrieving "friends" one has on Facebook. Brandtzaeg, Lüders, and Skjetne, (2010) find that people socially reject others who they felt were sharing information that was too private or personally tragic.…”
Section: Grief In the Internet Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more important the people in the interaction are to each other, the stronger the influence of their symbolic reaction to each other (Blumer, 1969;Erikson, 1968;James et al, 2010). With regards to expressions of grief on Facebook, most studies focus on the motivation or potential benefits of these posts on those grieving (Mitchell et al, 2012;Stokes, 2012). Little research exists regarding non-grieving Facebook "friends'" reactions to these grief postings, especially when they are in a more public venue such as wall posts as opposed to web memorials.…”
Section: Symbolic Interactionism Grief Socialization and Facebookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a performance to be believed by the audience, the performance must be coherent or continuous (Goffman 1969, 22). The audience of a nonymous social media site, such as Facebook, can point out irregularities in a user"s performance, as most online connections know the user offline as well (Stokes 2011,13, Donath & Boyd 2004.…”
Section: Identity On Facebook: Creating Back and Front Stagesmentioning
confidence: 99%