2021
DOI: 10.48027/hnb.43.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant pelobatid fossil larva from the middle Miocene of Bulgaria

Abstract: So far, in Bulgaria several fossils of extinct anuran species have been found, but all seem doubtful. Only two pelobatid remains have been found from the Balkans and the regions - younger species (Late Pleistocene) of the genus Pelobates from Serbia and Miocene Pelobates sp. from Turkey. The fossil in the current study represents a larva of the genus Eopelobates, the first discovery of this genus not only for Bulgaria but for the Balkans as well. This pelobatid larva is gigantic, more than 200 mm in total leng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If our identification is correct, the possible Late Pliocene Hambach Eopelobates is, thus, another unexpected late survivor from the site. Available published evidence suggest that Eopelobates went extinct before the beginning of the Pleistocene (but see Roček, 2003, andVergilov andTzankov, 2021, for an older extinction date), which agrees with the fact that Quaternary sites in the area close to Hambach only yielded Pelobates (Böttcher, 1991;Holman, 1998;Sanchiz, 1998;Schouten, 2016;Villa et al, 2018c).…”
Section: Palaeobiogeographical Significance Of the Hambach Amphibian ...supporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If our identification is correct, the possible Late Pliocene Hambach Eopelobates is, thus, another unexpected late survivor from the site. Available published evidence suggest that Eopelobates went extinct before the beginning of the Pleistocene (but see Roček, 2003, andVergilov andTzankov, 2021, for an older extinction date), which agrees with the fact that Quaternary sites in the area close to Hambach only yielded Pelobates (Böttcher, 1991;Holman, 1998;Sanchiz, 1998;Schouten, 2016;Villa et al, 2018c).…”
Section: Palaeobiogeographical Significance Of the Hambach Amphibian ...supporting
confidence: 61%
“…A situation similar to that of palaeobatrachids arises for pelobatids from Hambach as well. Several pelobatids are reported from the Palaeogene and Neogene of Europe (e.g., Sanchiz, 1998;Roček, 2013;Vergilov and Tzankov, 2021;and reference therein), but only few of them come from the northwestern part of the continent, where Hambach is located. Miocene pelobatids found in the area come from only three localities placed slightly eastward to the latter site: an Aquitanian indeterminate member of the family from Budenheim, near Mainz, mentioned, but neither described nor figured, by Schleich (1988); several Burdigalian remains of Pelobates sanchizi Venczel, 2004 from Echzell (Vasilyan et al, 2022); and a Middle Miocene premetamorphic tadpole from Climbach, near Allendorf, attributed to Eopelobates sp.…”
Section: Palaeobiogeographical Significance Of the Hambach Amphibian ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation