2020
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb3209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant piezoelectricity in oxide thin films with nanopillar structure

Abstract: High-performance piezoelectric materials are critical components for electromechanical sensors and actuators. For more than 60 years, the main strategy for obtaining large piezoelectric response has been to construct multiphase boundaries, where nanoscale domains with local structural and polar heterogeneity are formed, by tuning complex chemical compositions. We used a different strategy to emulate such local heterogeneity by forming nanopillar regions in perovskite oxide thin films. We obtained a giant effec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the nanopillars are exactly the same as the matrix, but with a shift of a half unit cell along both in-plane directions. Consistent with our previous report 22 , the relative unit-cell shift δ C between nanopillars and the matrix along the c direction, observed along the cross-sectional views, can be described by < a /2, b /2, δ C > , where a and b are unit vectors along in-plane directions and δ C is the displacement along the out-of-plane direction. The relative misfit (δ C ) along the out-of-plane direction clearly differentiates the present boundary from the conventional antiphase boundary.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is clear that the nanopillars are exactly the same as the matrix, but with a shift of a half unit cell along both in-plane directions. Consistent with our previous report 22 , the relative unit-cell shift δ C between nanopillars and the matrix along the c direction, observed along the cross-sectional views, can be described by < a /2, b /2, δ C > , where a and b are unit vectors along in-plane directions and δ C is the displacement along the out-of-plane direction. The relative misfit (δ C ) along the out-of-plane direction clearly differentiates the present boundary from the conventional antiphase boundary.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, in the present case an AO (A being A-site atom) layer is missing between two perfect perovskite regions with one region shifted by (a/2, b/2, δ C ) instead of (a/2, b/2, c/2). This is different from an antiphase boundary but still belongs to an OOP boundary, displacing a lattice mismatch of a fraction of a unit cell dimension in neighboring regions of the crystal 22 , 25 . Thus, we still refer to it as an OOP boundary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations