2017
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gingival Crevicular Fluid Turnover Markers in Premenopausal vs Postmenopausal Women receiving Orthodontic Treatment

Abstract: Background: Orthodontic treatment is one of the commonly used dental treatments. Orthodontic forces act on the bone by modulating the biomolecules, chiefly the osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteopontin (OPN), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK), and RANK ligand (RANKL) (OPG ligand). Hormonal changes are known to cause marked alteration in the levels of these biomolecules. Hence, we planned this study to evaluate the response of bone biomarkers in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) in postmenopausal w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the 64 studies, another 49 studies were excluded after full-text assessment, leaving 15 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria (Additional file 5 ). Five were RCTs [ 16 – 20 ], 9 were prospective, non-randomized studies [ 21 29 ] and 1 was of cross-sectional design [ 30 ] (Table 1 ). The process of final study inclusion in this review is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Out of the 64 studies, another 49 studies were excluded after full-text assessment, leaving 15 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria (Additional file 5 ). Five were RCTs [ 16 – 20 ], 9 were prospective, non-randomized studies [ 21 29 ] and 1 was of cross-sectional design [ 30 ] (Table 1 ). The process of final study inclusion in this review is presented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None was rated at low risk of bias. Five of the included studies were rated at moderate risk of bias [ 21 , 22 , 24 , 27 , 28 ]. Two studies were rated at serious risk of bias [ 23 , 29 ] and another two at critical risk of bias [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations