1960
DOI: 10.1016/0003-9969(60)90019-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gingival health and dental cleanliness in english schoolchildren

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

1969
1969
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[25][26][27][28] With either tooth enamel or a restorative material, gingival inflammation is caused by bacterial products elaborated within the dental plaque. The bacterial products are also the primary etiologic factor in dental caries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28] With either tooth enamel or a restorative material, gingival inflammation is caused by bacterial products elaborated within the dental plaque. The bacterial products are also the primary etiologic factor in dental caries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of water-soluble and alkali-soluble fractions was approximately 60:40 in both natural and experimental plaques. Some epidemiological observations have suggested that teeth exposed to natural fluoridation are cleaner than those in areas with a low fluo ride content [Möller, 1965;Kotrba et al, 1966], Other authors have found a non-significant relationship between the fluoride content in drinking water and gingivitis or quantity of plaque [James et al, 1960; Englander and White, 1964; Moore et al, 1964; M urray, 1969;Künzel and Palitzsch, 1970].Tn the intercellular matrix of dental plaque, fluoride ions are concen trated up to the amount of 0.8-1.8 ppm. The fluoride content in plaque is significantly higher in fluoridated localities than in control areas [Dawes et al, 1965], A larger amount of fluoride ions is supposed to be bound to or within the microbial cells [Jenkins et al, 1969].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because of higher percentage of hyper mineralized surface, resorption bays/cavitations, partial/initial mineralization of connective tissue fibers, insertion area for fibers; globular mineralization debris than the non-Fluorosed group. 27 Within the fluorosis group, the presence of the four organisms were analyzed and compared between mild, moderate and severe fluorosis subgroups using Kruskal Wallis ANOVA TEST and further comparison between the subgroups was done using Mann Whitney U test. The comparison revealed statistically insignificant difference in the However the detection rates of T. forsythia were higher in moderate and severe fluorosis subgroups and these differences when compared with Kruskal Wallis ANOVA TEST were statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%