2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIP-SWMM: A new Green Infrastructure Placement Tool coupled with SWMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using regional planning tools such as RBEROST as screening tools in an iterative approach to planning facilitates more efficient approaches to further, more detailed, localized modeling (Dong et al, 2020). More specialized tools that could be informed by RBEROST screening level outputs include the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF; Tomer et al 2013, 2015, 2021), WMOST (Detenbeck, Piscopo, et al, 2018; Detenbeck, ten Brink, et al, 2018), or the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM; Shojaeizadeh et al, 2021). Screening with RBEROST identifies NHDPlus catchments where management is likely to be most cost‐effective, and more localized modeling in these catchments will be able to optimize management options potentially to the parcel or field scale (Srinivas et al, 2020), and will be able to incorporate information such as variation in farmers', stormwater managers', and WWTP operators' willingness to take risks (Eckart et al, 2017; Muga & Mihelcic, 2008; Prokopy, 2020; Prokopy et al, 2008, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using regional planning tools such as RBEROST as screening tools in an iterative approach to planning facilitates more efficient approaches to further, more detailed, localized modeling (Dong et al, 2020). More specialized tools that could be informed by RBEROST screening level outputs include the Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF; Tomer et al 2013, 2015, 2021), WMOST (Detenbeck, Piscopo, et al, 2018; Detenbeck, ten Brink, et al, 2018), or the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM; Shojaeizadeh et al, 2021). Screening with RBEROST identifies NHDPlus catchments where management is likely to be most cost‐effective, and more localized modeling in these catchments will be able to optimize management options potentially to the parcel or field scale (Srinivas et al, 2020), and will be able to incorporate information such as variation in farmers', stormwater managers', and WWTP operators' willingness to take risks (Eckart et al, 2017; Muga & Mihelcic, 2008; Prokopy, 2020; Prokopy et al, 2008, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common methods either produce a single optimal solution or in the case of multiple objectives, a combination of solutions reflecting tradeoffs between objectives (Eckart et al, 2017; Kumar et al, 2021; Qi et al, 2020). Most optimization studies focus on one type of land use (e.g., Gallo et al, 2020; Jiang et al, 2021; Shojaeizadeh et al, 2021), and optimize practices in smaller areas on the order of hectares to hundreds of square kilometers (Detenbeck, ten Brink, et al, 2018; Jiang et al, 2021; Shojaeizadeh et al, 2021). Strokal et al (2020) and Kaufman et al (2021) provide notable exceptions for large, multiple land‐use, optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shojaeizadeh et al [74] developed a new green Infrastructure Placement Tool coupled with Storm Water Management Model (GIP-SWMM) for selection and strategic placement of green infrastructure practices. The performance of the tool was evaluated in the Meade-Hawthorne drainage basin in Rapid City, South Dakota (USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, an urban hydrologic model named SWMM is used to simulate and reflect the relationships between rainfall and runoff. SWMM is widely used in urban flood analysis and hydraulic practices, and it has very good simulated performances in both urban and natural basins [51,52]. Since the theory of the SWMM model is introduced in detail in a previous study by Gironás et al [53], we do not show more details about the SWMM model in this study.…”
Section: Urban Hydrologic Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%