2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-012-0817-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GIS-based multicriteria analysis: an approach to select priority areas for preservation in the Ahaggar National Park, Algeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research is based on GIS techniques that allow criteria derived from different sources like experts opinion to be combined in order to support vulnerability analysis. The capabilities of GIS in handling spatial aspects of conservation have boosted its use in the criteriabased evaluation for the prioritization and selection of potential conservation areas (Hamadouche et al 2013). The result of combination of AHP method and GIS analysis is vulnerability assessment of the cities against the earthquake with higher accuracy (Rashed and Weeks 2003;Thirumalaivasan et al 2003;Xiong et al 2007).…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research is based on GIS techniques that allow criteria derived from different sources like experts opinion to be combined in order to support vulnerability analysis. The capabilities of GIS in handling spatial aspects of conservation have boosted its use in the criteriabased evaluation for the prioritization and selection of potential conservation areas (Hamadouche et al 2013). The result of combination of AHP method and GIS analysis is vulnerability assessment of the cities against the earthquake with higher accuracy (Rashed and Weeks 2003;Thirumalaivasan et al 2003;Xiong et al 2007).…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In land-use suitability assessment, for example, alternative options and preferences for land use can be determined using MCDA, through the identification of desirable objectives, related attributes, and criteria, such as social, economic, environmental and ecological factors. Some successful work of combining GIS and MCDA can be seen in the work of Jessy Paquette and John Lowry about assessing flood hazard [7], BachtiarFezizadeh and Thomas Blaschke about landslide analyzing [8], Gbanie and colleagues about modelling landfill location [9], and Hamadouche and colleagues about finding best preservation area [10].…”
Section: Gis-mcdamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferretti et al's article summaries thirteen MCDA applications in heritage studies [4]. Amongst thirteen papers summarised plus two papers written by Ferretti et al, fifteen in total, there are seven papers using MCDA for site ranking [4,5,[13][14][15][16][17], six using MCDA + GIS for site ranking by mapping [18][19][20][21][22][23], one using MCDA for acquiring management priorities (i.e., importance of criteria) for ecosystem services [24] and one using MCDA for plan ranking in a given area [25]. All of them are applying criteria with known information, which means none of them deal with dynamic problems or involves unknown scenarios, regardless of a high inclusion of heritage management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%