2009
DOI: 10.1080/00048400802340642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giving Dualism its Due

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But there is little reason to grant the truth of either premise. 17 The causal exclusion premise seems to have much to recommend it initially. This premise rules out the possibility of overdetermination, i.e., the idea that physical effects might have nonphysical causes as well as complete physical causes.…”
Section: The Case For Naturalismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But there is little reason to grant the truth of either premise. 17 The causal exclusion premise seems to have much to recommend it initially. This premise rules out the possibility of overdetermination, i.e., the idea that physical effects might have nonphysical causes as well as complete physical causes.…”
Section: The Case For Naturalismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It really depends on how intuitively plausible one finds the idea of incorporeal entities having delimited spatial locations. Perhaps a more fully fleshed out characterization of the divinely infused property of containment would help, but Hales does not provide one here …”
Section: Whether An Angel Exists In a Corporeal Placementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frank D. Dilley concludes that “substance dualism is much more defensible than it has been given credit for being” (, 136). And William G. Lycan notes that while this view has very few contemporary defenders, “no convincing case has been made against substance dualism” (, 551).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%