1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009602707067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: The standard method of peptide library synthesis involves coupling steps in which a single amino acid is reacted with a mixture of resin-bound amino acids. The more recently described positional scanning strategy (in which each position in the peptide sequence is occupied in turn by a single residue) is different since it involves the coupling of mixtures of amino acids to mixtures of resin-bound amino acids. In the present study, we analyze the compounds produced under these conditions measuring coupling rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, classic combinatorial library methods do not readily lend themselves to detailed kinetic analyses, especially at the individual member level. We ruled out the one bead/one compound approach (15) as well as the positional scanning method (16,17) due to difficulties associated with quantitatively measuring kinetic constants in either the solid state or on nonequimolar mixtures of Tyr(P) peptides (18). Although these combinatorial methods cannot be used to assess the substrate efficacy of individual library members, both approaches generate a large number of peptides and therefore furnish a comprehensive appraisal of the diversity space associated with the substrate binding pocket on the target enzyme(s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, classic combinatorial library methods do not readily lend themselves to detailed kinetic analyses, especially at the individual member level. We ruled out the one bead/one compound approach (15) as well as the positional scanning method (16,17) due to difficulties associated with quantitatively measuring kinetic constants in either the solid state or on nonequimolar mixtures of Tyr(P) peptides (18). Although these combinatorial methods cannot be used to assess the substrate efficacy of individual library members, both approaches generate a large number of peptides and therefore furnish a comprehensive appraisal of the diversity space associated with the substrate binding pocket on the target enzyme(s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mixtures were white to yellowish powders that could be handled in the assay, the same way as if they were discrete chemicals. They were analyzed using MS and MS/MS techniques (40,45,46) providing enough information to ensure (i) the lack of major by-products in the mixture and (ii) the presence of the accounted structures in the sublibraries. Furthermore, in each sublibrary, individual amino acids were indeed found to be present in roughly equal amounts by two-dimensional NMR (40).…”
Section: Peptide Library Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, extremely different pharmacokinetic (PK) data have been reported in all these studies and the reality is not clear. It is also uncertain what diosmetin metabolites are circulating in body fluids; a single work on identification of diosmetin conjugates in animal samples has been published [14], and another paper mentions, without methodological details, quantitative measurements of diosmetin-3- O -glucuronide (3- O -Gluc) in human plasma [13] (chemical formulas of the possible glucuronide metabolites can be seen in Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%