1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf03374455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass bottle push-ups and pontil marks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This proportion is concomitant with the morphology of cylindrical and square bottles, which constitute the majority of the assemblage. Walls, too, are the less diagnostic part in a container because they usually lack manufacturing marks and other technological indicators (Jones, 1971;Lorrain, 1968;Rock, 1981). Bases appear next most frequently (17.8%), followed by angular fragments from square or troncopiramidal bottles (12.3%).…”
Section: General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This proportion is concomitant with the morphology of cylindrical and square bottles, which constitute the majority of the assemblage. Walls, too, are the less diagnostic part in a container because they usually lack manufacturing marks and other technological indicators (Jones, 1971;Lorrain, 1968;Rock, 1981). Bases appear next most frequently (17.8%), followed by angular fragments from square or troncopiramidal bottles (12.3%).…”
Section: General Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, each piece was macroscopically studied, specifying eight variables: dimensions, part of the container, kind of container, presence and distribution of patina, manufacture marks, postdepositional elements, color, and associations (Pedrotta and Bagaloni, 2003). These variables were defined using the work of other analysts, with a focus on the elements that allowed the identification of technological processes and chronological indicators (Baugher-Perlin, 1982;Fike, 1987;Jones, 1971;McKearin and Wilson, 1978;Moreno, 1997;Rock, 1981). For identifying the containers, we used catalogues Nöel Hume (1969), Fike (1987), Kovel (1992), Sellari (1989), Soetens (2001), and van den Bossche (2001), as well as Internet information on antique glass bottles and flasks.…”
Section: The Glass Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Este tipo de afirmação é resultado da análise formal das peças, a qual baseou-se no estudo de bibliografia específica acerca da produção de garrafas vítreas cilíndricas e troncopiramidal oitocentistas. As principais fontes consultadas foram: Jones (1971Jones ( ,1984Jones ( e 1985, Jones et al (1989), Moreno (1997Moreno ( , 2000, Graça (2005), Smith (2008) e Stone (1986. Em Soares et al (2006)…”
Section: A Análise Das Práticas Alimentares Dos Grupos Foqueiros Lobe...unclassified
“…Após a aplicação das fichas na coleção, utilizamos fórmulas sugeridas por Jones (1986) para estimar a capacidade das garrafas e compreender sua possível data média de produção. As principais referências para o desenvolvimento do trabalho foram Jones (1971), Jones et al (1989), Moreno (1997Moreno ( , 2000, Graça (2005) e Smith (2008. 7 Smith (2008, p.23), por exemplo, afirma que algumas garrafas eram reutilizadas para fins como preparo do terreno para plantio, ferramentas líticas, propósitos espirituais e outros; Jones et al (1989) e Jones (1986, de forma complementar, sugerem que garrafas poderiam ser recicladas para o armazenamento de grãos, sementes e outros.…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified