1984
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1984)110:2(197)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass Failure Prediction Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the maximum load resistance of 3.67 kPa (76.7 psf) was estimated using the procedure of ASTM E1300-09a [6]; this resistance is based on a 0.008 probability of breakage (cracking) of the lite and a 3-second load duration. Using the glass failure prediction model presented in Beason and Morgan [4] to adjust for a probability of breakage of approximately 0.500 (the lite's median resistance value), the lateral resistance becomes approximately 7.86 kPa (164 psf). Finally, adjusting from the 3-second load duration to the expected 30-minute load duration of the destructive panel tests, the lateral resistance becomes 5.27 kPa (110 psf).…”
Section: Laminated Glass Litesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the maximum load resistance of 3.67 kPa (76.7 psf) was estimated using the procedure of ASTM E1300-09a [6]; this resistance is based on a 0.008 probability of breakage (cracking) of the lite and a 3-second load duration. Using the glass failure prediction model presented in Beason and Morgan [4] to adjust for a probability of breakage of approximately 0.500 (the lite's median resistance value), the lateral resistance becomes approximately 7.86 kPa (164 psf). Finally, adjusting from the 3-second load duration to the expected 30-minute load duration of the destructive panel tests, the lateral resistance becomes 5.27 kPa (110 psf).…”
Section: Laminated Glass Litesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the probabilistic failure prediction model for glass plates developed by Beason and Morgan [4] and the work of Vallabhan [5], ASTM E1300-09a [6] provides a design procedure for rectangular glass lites supported on one, two, three, or four edges and subjected to 3-second wind loads. Monolithic and laminated glass lites subjected to blast and impact loads, for example, have received signifi cant attention [7][8][9][10][11][12]33] and design charts equating blast loading to 3-second duration wind loads have been developed [13], ASTM F2248-09 [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The glass failure prediction model (GFPM) by Beason and Morgan [3] is an unrestricted model that predicts glass break strength and deflection. The GFPM is the basis for ASTM E1300, the North American Standard on glass selection for wind loads, and is based on theoretical development as supported by a review of thousands of test data records for glass break.…”
Section: Glass Failure Prediction Model Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the strength is explained assuming the existence of Griffith flaws and supposing the weakest-link principle. Predictions are based either on some standard distribution or on tables and diagrams obtained using a modelling tool such as the Glass Failure Prediction Model (GFPM) (Beason and Morgan 1984). There is disagreement among researchers as to which prediction model is the correct one to use (Fischer-Cripps and Collins 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%