1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1971.tb03153.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glasshouse Studies on Ophiobolus graminis as a Cause of Whiteheads in Wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction of the root system's ability to supply the plant with adequate water and nutrients could be brought about by either a reduction in size of the root system, or a reduction in the efficiency of uptake. In support of the former, infection has been observed to stop root growth (Clarkson et al ., 1975), reduce seminal root dry weights (Asher, 1972), cause root death below the point of infection (Deacon & Henry, 1978) and reduce total root length (Chambers, 1971). However, there are indications that infected plants could compensate by the production of extra crown roots (Davis, 1925; Russell, 1931, 1934; Defosse, 1959), although this may be limited to early in the season (Asher, 1972; Bailey & Gilligan, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reduction of the root system's ability to supply the plant with adequate water and nutrients could be brought about by either a reduction in size of the root system, or a reduction in the efficiency of uptake. In support of the former, infection has been observed to stop root growth (Clarkson et al ., 1975), reduce seminal root dry weights (Asher, 1972), cause root death below the point of infection (Deacon & Henry, 1978) and reduce total root length (Chambers, 1971). However, there are indications that infected plants could compensate by the production of extra crown roots (Davis, 1925; Russell, 1931, 1934; Defosse, 1959), although this may be limited to early in the season (Asher, 1972; Bailey & Gilligan, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased availability may allow sufficient uptake to be maintained at lower RLDs, thus ameliorating the effects of take‐all. For instance, Chambers (1971) reported that infected plants had higher yields when grown in soil with 13% volumetric soil moisture content than in soil with 8%, even though they had similar lengths of root infected. However, increasing soil moisture has also been observed to promote take‐all infection (Cook & Papendick, 1972; Trolldenier, 1981; Murray et al ., 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%