Glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Paul, Ryan; Maldonado-Rodriguez, Naomi; Docter, Shgufta; Khan, Moin; Veillette, Christian; Verma, Nikhil N.; Nicholson, Gregory P.; Leroux, Timothy

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.011

Cited by 32 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some have highlighted concerns with increased complication rates and limitations on activity after RTSA. 12 A recent systematic review pooled 254 patients across seven studies and found a pooled mean complication rate of 17.6%, 28 which is higher than our complication rate of 12.6%. Similar to our study, both techniques show a statistically significant improvement in functional outcomes and range of motion.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

“…Similar to our study, both techniques show a statistically significant improvement in functional outcomes and range of motion. 28 Our study has numerous strengths in its rigorous methodology with a systematic review of several databases and duplicate data screening and extraction. This is the first study to quantify the rates of revision, complication, and patient satisfaction across all TSA with bone graft studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging in patients with complex glenoid wear patterns and bone loss. Severe retroversion (>15°) or significant bone loss may require bone grafting. This review summarizes the rate of revision and long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases was conducted from the date of inception to 23 October 2018. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The primary outcome was rate of revision. The secondary outcomes were rate of component loosening, functional outcome, and range of motion. Results Of the 1056 articles identified in the search, 26 underwent full-text screening and 7 articles were included in the analysis. All procedures were one-stage anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. The rate of revision was 5.4% with component loosening and infection listed as indications over a weighted mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. Complications occurred in 12.6% of patients. Conclusion Glenoid bone grafting in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in comparable revision rates and improvement in pain compared to augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the low quality of evidence, further prospective studies should be conducted. Level of evidence IV

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 50%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our opinion, the management of glenoid retroversion could become challenging with this surgical solution. Additionally, eccentric bone grafts show a lower union rate compared with concentric grafts as recently reported in the literature [ 13 ].…”

Section: Surgical Treatmentsmentioning

confidence: 88%

Custom-made reverse shoulder arthroplasty for severe glenoid bone loss: review of the literature and our preliminary results

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The treatment of severe glenoid bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty represents a challenge, and the results of current prosthetic designs with only glenoid fixation still remain unsatisfactory. In the past decade, customized glenoid prostheses have been developed to address severe glenoid arthritis and in the revision setting. In this review, we analyzed the current surgical options, the classification limits, past literature evidence, and our preliminary results of 6 patients (3 male, 3 female) treated with a reverse implant and custom-made glenoid implant (ProMade; LimaCorporate, Italy). Computer analysis of the residual shape and the amount of glenoid bone stock in association with new classifications could help the surgeon to obtain good clinical and radiological outcomes. The development of navigation systems could improve the adequacy of the implant and, thus, the reliability and longevity of the implant itself.

show abstract

“…10 Variability in graft selection and technique may be reasons for disparate results. 13,18 Boileau et al described their technique for increasing glenoid offset and correction of glenoid dysplasia in the setting of shoulder arthroplasty. 4 Angled bony-increased offset-reserve shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) utilized humeral head autografting with great success to both lateralize and correct severe dysplasia of the glenoid.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Glenoid reconstruction with autologous humeral head for glenoid dysplasia in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Millan

Ford

Favorito

2021

JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Glenoid bone grafting in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Cited by 32 publications

References 20 publications

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Glenoid bone grafting in primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Custom-made reverse shoulder arthroplasty for severe glenoid bone loss: review of the literature and our preliminary results

Glenoid reconstruction with autologous humeral head for glenoid dysplasia in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About