2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04393-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glioblastoma mutations alter EGFR dimer structure to prevent ligand bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of those genes, such as CDKN2A (Kraus et al, 2001;Hu et al, 2017), CA9 (Said et al, 2007), and HSPB1 (Rajesh et al, 2020), were also found in previous reports, which further confirmed the feasibility of our study design. Further analysis found that CDKN2A, TP53, IDH1, and EGFR were still the most abnormally altered genes in glioblastoma (Figure 1) (Kraus et al, 2001;Hu et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2022;Hu et al, 2018), while the most common variation in SNP was C > T (Figure 1C) (McDonald et al, 2013;Mistry et al, 2018). This was similar to the mutation frequency of TP53 and IDH1 obtained in the immunohistochemistry of clinical samples (Table 2; Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Some of those genes, such as CDKN2A (Kraus et al, 2001;Hu et al, 2017), CA9 (Said et al, 2007), and HSPB1 (Rajesh et al, 2020), were also found in previous reports, which further confirmed the feasibility of our study design. Further analysis found that CDKN2A, TP53, IDH1, and EGFR were still the most abnormally altered genes in glioblastoma (Figure 1) (Kraus et al, 2001;Hu et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2022;Hu et al, 2018), while the most common variation in SNP was C > T (Figure 1C) (McDonald et al, 2013;Mistry et al, 2018). This was similar to the mutation frequency of TP53 and IDH1 obtained in the immunohistochemistry of clinical samples (Table 2; Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…First, high- and low-affinity ligands are expected to bind to their receptor with different affinities, which we modeled by varying the dissociation rate of ligand-receptor complexes using a scaling parameter β. Second, low-affinity ligands have been reported to produce structurally different EGFR dimers compared to high-affinity ligands, thereby reducing the dimerization affinity of ligand-bound receptors (Freed et al, 2017; Hu et al, 2022); we modeled this dimerization affinity by varying the dissociation rate of ligand-bound dimers using a scaling parameter γ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the prediction of our model, we experimentally altered the dimerization affinity of EGFR and monitored signaling responses using pYtags. We turned to glioblastoma multiform (GBM)-associated mutations in the extracellular domain of EGFR (R84K and A265V point mutations), which were previously shown to increase the dimerization affinity of EREG- and EPGN-bound receptors (Hu et al, 2022). We first modeled these GBM-associated mutations in EGFR by decreasing β and γ by 6-fold and 650-fold, respectively (Hu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations