2016
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2016.2516564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global and Local Information in Clustering Labeled Block Models

Abstract: The stochastic block model is a classical cluster-exhibiting random graph model that has been widely studied in statistics, physics and computer science. In its simplest form, the model is a random graph with two equal-sized clusters, with intra-cluster edge probability p, and intercluster edge probability q. We focus on the sparse case, i.e., p, q = O(1/n), which is practically more relevant and also mathematically more challenging. A conjecture of Decelle, Krzakala, Moore and Zdeborová, based on ideas from s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results in the case where (2) does not hold have been proved in [8]. In the large degree d regime, our result improves Proposition 3 in [9] which deals only with the case p = 0.5 and λ larger than a large constant C. The fact that local algorithms are very efficient as soon as q > 0 (even optimal in the limit q → 0) leads to linear time algorithms for community detection (when some labels are revealed). Indeed from a practical perspective, we believe that our analysis carries over to the labeled stochastic block model [10], [11].…”
Section: Reconstructability Above the Kesten-stigum Boundsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar results in the case where (2) does not hold have been proved in [8]. In the large degree d regime, our result improves Proposition 3 in [9] which deals only with the case p = 0.5 and λ larger than a large constant C. The fact that local algorithms are very efficient as soon as q > 0 (even optimal in the limit q → 0) leads to linear time algorithms for community detection (when some labels are revealed). Indeed from a practical perspective, we believe that our analysis carries over to the labeled stochastic block model [10], [11].…”
Section: Reconstructability Above the Kesten-stigum Boundsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A local algorithm is an algorithm that bases the estimate of the spin of a vertex i only on the neighborhood of vertex i of radius t. In general, local algorithms are not able to obtain a success probability (2) larger than zero in the stochastic block model [9], so that an estimator based on a local algorithm does not satisfy (4). However, when a vanishing fraction of vertices reveals their labels, a local algorithm is able to achieve the maximum possible success probability (2) when the parameters of the stochastic block model are above the Kesten Stigum threshold [9].…”
Section: Local Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sparse SBM, only weak recovery is expected, where the goal is to predict labels which have non-trivial correlation with true labels. It was shown in [13], [14] that observing labels of a vanishingly small fraction of nodes randomly does not affect the weak recovery asymptotically but can lead to efficient local algorithms (in which the label prediction at each node depends only on its local neighborhood), whenever recovery is possible. The effect of sampling on exact recovery in SBM with logdegree, i.e., with p = a ln n/n and q = b ln n/n has not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%