2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-015-2394-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Aspects of (0,2) Moduli Space: Toric Varieties and Tangent Bundles

Abstract: We study the moduli space of A/2 half-twisted gauged linear sigma models for NEF Fano toric varieties. Focusing on toric deformations of the tangent bundle, we describe the vacuum structure of many (0,2) theories, in particular identifying loci in parameter space with spontaneous supersymmetry breaking or divergent ground ring correlators. We find that the parameter space of such an A/2 theory and its ground ring is in general a moduli stack, and we show in examples that with suitable stability conditions it i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for a reductive quotient, one has to provide stability conditions to obtain a well-behaved (though perhaps singular) space. Similar issues arise already in a simpler toric setting [16,27].…”
Section: Redefinitions and Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Even for a reductive quotient, one has to provide stability conditions to obtain a well-behaved (though perhaps singular) space. Similar issues arise already in a simpler toric setting [16,27].…”
Section: Redefinitions and Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For instance, techniques to evaluate B and B/2 model correlators in hybrid models [25,26] have been recently developed [24], and these could be employed to gain insights into this larger set of theories. While we expect a dependence on non-diagonal, but linear, E-parameters, nonlinear E-parameters seem not to affect A/2-twisted V model correlators [27][28][29]. However, the situation is more subtle for A/2-twisted M models, where the supersymmetry constraint relates E and J parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Assume that the deformation on G(k 1 , N 1 ) × G(k 2 , N 2 ) is given by N 1 × N 1 matrices A, B and N 2 × N 2 matrices C, D as in (15). The quantum sheaf cohomology is given by (22). On the other hand, the deformation on G(…”
Section: Note That Quantum Corrections Do Not Change This Results Becamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that deg(q 1 ) = N 1 , deg(q 2 ) = N 2 . We conclude that the quantum sheaf cohomology of 12 , · · · , y 11 , y 12 , · · · , x 21 , x 22 , · · · , y 21 , y 22 , · · · ]/(I + R), (22) where I is the same as the (2,2) case and R is generated by…”
Section: Product Of Grassmanniansmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation