2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global asset prices and FOMC announcements

Abstract: This paper documents the impact of U.S. monetary policy announcement surprises on foreign equity indexes, short-and long-term interest rates, and exchange rates in 49 countries. We use two proxies for monetary policy surprises: the surprise change to the current target federal funds rate (target surprise) and the revision to the path of future monetary policy (path surprise). We find that different asset classes respond to different components of the monetary policy surprises. Global equity indexes respond mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
114
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
16
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim (2001), Hausman andWongswan (2011), andKazi, Wagan, andAkbar (2013) show that conventional monetary policy shocks in the United States have particularly strong effects on Canadian yields. In particular, Hausman and Wongswan (2011) show that surprises to both the current policy rate and the expected path of future rates in the United States have comparable effects on Canadian long-term rates as they do on U.S. long-term rates. Kazi, Wagan, and Akbar (2013) show that a 100 bps tightening of U.S. policy rates lead to an increase in short-term rates of 70 to 100 bps and in long-term rates by 60 to 90 bps in remaining OECD countries, including Canada.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim (2001), Hausman andWongswan (2011), andKazi, Wagan, andAkbar (2013) show that conventional monetary policy shocks in the United States have particularly strong effects on Canadian yields. In particular, Hausman and Wongswan (2011) show that surprises to both the current policy rate and the expected path of future rates in the United States have comparable effects on Canadian long-term rates as they do on U.S. long-term rates. Kazi, Wagan, and Akbar (2013) show that a 100 bps tightening of U.S. policy rates lead to an increase in short-term rates of 70 to 100 bps and in long-term rates by 60 to 90 bps in remaining OECD countries, including Canada.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated the international spillovers of US unconventional monetary policy to other countries (e.g., Ahmed & Zlate, 2014;Ahmed et al, 2017;Anaya et al, 2017;Barroso et al, 2016;Bowman et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2016;Fratzscher et al, 2016;Gambacorta et al, 2014;Georgiadis, 2016;Hausman & Wongswan, 2011;Rogers et al, 2014;Tillmann, 2016). This paper examines the spillovers of US conventional and unconventional monetary policies to Russian financial markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Bowman et al (2015) and Chen et al (2016) do not include Russia in their estimations. Fratzscher et al (2017) and Hausman and Wongswan (2011) include Russia, but do not include oil prices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the previous literature (e.g., Wang, Yang and Wu 2006, Wang, Yang and Simpson 2008, Wongswan 2009, Hausman and Wongswan 2011, Xu and Yang 2011, we use the event study methodology to examine the change in mortgage rates around the FOMC announcements. We further refine the methodology in the previous literature in two aspects.…”
Section: The Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, FOMC statements disseminate additional information on the future path of monetary policy beyond the information on the target federal funds rate. 1 This article extends the recent central bank communication literature on other U.S. financial markets (Bernanke, Reinhart and Sack 2004, Gürkaynak, Sack and Swanson 2005, Wang, Yang and Wu 2006, Wang, Yang and Simpson 2008, Wongswan 2009, Hausman and Wongswan 2011, Xu and Yang 2011 and uses two factors to better measure U.S. monetary policy surprises. We find evidence that mortgage rates react to both the target and path factors in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%