2005
DOI: 10.1175/ei126.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Biomass Variation and Its Geodynamic Effects: 1982–98

Abstract: Redistribution of mass near Earth’s surface alters its rotation, gravity field, and geocenter location. Advanced techniques for measuring these geodetic variations now exist, but the ability to attribute the observed modes to individual Earth system processes has been hampered by a shortage of reliable global data on such processes, especially hydrospheric processes. To address one aspect of this deficiency, 17 yr of monthly, global maps of vegetation biomass were produced by applying field-based relationships… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adopting that view might be appropriate given that the technique described here supposes groundwater to be spatially continuous across the region of interest, and it would effectively eliminate surface water variations as a source of error. Rodell et al (2005) applied field-based relationships to satellite derived maps of leaf area index in order to produce monthly, global maps of vegetation biomass. They showed that seasonal and interannual biomass variations typically were smaller than the uncertainty in GRACE based hydrology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopting that view might be appropriate given that the technique described here supposes groundwater to be spatially continuous across the region of interest, and it would effectively eliminate surface water variations as a source of error. Rodell et al (2005) applied field-based relationships to satellite derived maps of leaf area index in order to produce monthly, global maps of vegetation biomass. They showed that seasonal and interannual biomass variations typically were smaller than the uncertainty in GRACE based hydrology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing the effects of atmospheric surface pressure and ocean bottom pressures changes [Tapley et al, 2004] and considering the relatively small contribution of changes in vegetation biomass [Rodell et al, 2005], the variability in the resulting monthly gravity solutions results primarily from redistribution of terrestrial total water storage (TWS) [Rodell et al, 2004a]. For cases without large water storage changes within surface water reservoirs, changes in TWS are mainly driven by changes in soil moisture storage (SMS) and groundwater storage, suggesting the potential of using GRACE data to examine hydrological controls on vegetation dynamics.…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interannual variations in biomass have been shown to be well below the detection limits of GRACE 18 . The climate of the study region is warm and the terrain shallow; hence, snow is uncommon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%