2018
DOI: 10.1163/9789004383449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Citizenship, Common Wealth and Uncommon Citizenships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Martin, 2011;Pashby, 2012Pashby, , 2018. As Shultz and Pillay (2018) assert More often than otherwise, global citizenship literature and theorizing represents the continuing dominance of western discourses and related epistemic constructions that do little challenge the citizenship or educational needs of those who need them the most. .…”
Section: Engaging Critiques Of Esd and Gcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin, 2011;Pashby, 2012Pashby, , 2018. As Shultz and Pillay (2018) assert More often than otherwise, global citizenship literature and theorizing represents the continuing dominance of western discourses and related epistemic constructions that do little challenge the citizenship or educational needs of those who need them the most. .…”
Section: Engaging Critiques Of Esd and Gcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars such as Matthews (2011) note a lack of attention to the interdependence of globalization, postcolonialism, and environmental matters, and a perpetuation of Western epistemologies at the expense of non-Western and indigenous worldviews (see also Blenkinsop et al, 2017). Scholars writing critically about GCE argue superficial approaches to teaching about global issues step over ethical issues and reinforce colonial systems of power in the materials and approaches offered to learners (e.g., Andreotti, 2011a;Martin, 2011;Pashby, 2012;Shultz & Pillay, 2018). Reflecting on the UNDSD, Huckle & Wals (2015) argue for a stronger transformative emphasis and suggest an approach that bridges ESD and global learning into global education for sustainable citizenship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blenkinsop et al, 2017;Matthews, 2011). Similarly, global learning initiatives including those supporting global citizenship seem to have largely taken soft approaches, stepping over complex and ethical issues, particularly those around power inequality and on-going colonial legacies (Andreotti, 2006;Shultz & Pillay, 2018). Consequently, scholarship indicates in many cases education about global issues has arguably served to perpetuate the reproduction of the global systems of power that have caused these problems in the first place (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%