1996
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1996)108<0195:gcgbpt>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global coal gap between Permian–Triassic extinction and Middle Triassic recovery of peat-forming plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
183
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
183
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the 7 Myr 'coal gap' is the result of an insufficient amount of plant material to form coal deposits, and hence little food for large browsing animals. Permian levels of plant diversity were not reached again until the Late Triassic (230 Myr ago; Retallack et al 1996). Tracking diet proportions through the first five stages of the Triassic shows a clear trend towards reaching a pre-extinction balance of communities dominated by predators and browsers with a smaller proportion of piscivores and insectivores ( figure 3b).…”
Section: Across the Permo-triassic Boundary: Ecosystem Restructuring mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the 7 Myr 'coal gap' is the result of an insufficient amount of plant material to form coal deposits, and hence little food for large browsing animals. Permian levels of plant diversity were not reached again until the Late Triassic (230 Myr ago; Retallack et al 1996). Tracking diet proportions through the first five stages of the Triassic shows a clear trend towards reaching a pre-extinction balance of communities dominated by predators and browsers with a smaller proportion of piscivores and insectivores ( figure 3b).…”
Section: Across the Permo-triassic Boundary: Ecosystem Restructuring mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, this type of recovery happened quickly after the end-Permian event by the Olenekian (250-245 Myr ago), but then the diversity fell again (figure 1), either as a result of displaced disaster taxa that had filled empty guilds or the devastation caused by another extinction pulse at the end of the Olenekian. In contrast, the ecological recovery of tetrapods and plants was slow, and lost guilds and trophic levels were not readily refilled (Retallack et al 1996;Benton et al 2004;Grauvogel-Stamm & Ash 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conjunction with the end-Permian ecological crisis, extinction among dominant gymnosperms appears to be a global event that dramatically affected terrestrial ecosystems. Justified by worldwide changes in vegetation structure and soil characteristics, as well as by strongly increased fungal activity, dieback of woody vegetation caused an unparalleled loss of standing biomass irrespective of floral provinciality and climatic zonation (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). However, because of the condensed or otherwise incomplete nature of most end-Permian palynological records, vegetation development at the climax of ecological crisis could be inferred only in very general terms.…”
Section: End-permian Floral Extinction Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of these substantial coal deposits 200 million years after the undisputed evolution of wood-rotting fungi sharply conflicts with the evolutionary lag model (132). Although at least some coal has accumulated at nearly all times since the evolution of vascular plants (133), the only time a wet tropics has coincided with globally extensive low-latitude foreland basin-like depositional systems over the last 400 million years has been during the Carboniferous assembly of Pangea. The magnitude of Carboniferous−Permian coal production was not a product of increased plant lignin content coupled with the delayed evolution of lignin-degrading fungi but rather a unique confluence of climate and tectonics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%