Global Commons in the Global Brain

Last, Cadell

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.013

Cited by 21 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As described in Section 3.3, excessive cooperativity makes the collective predictable in future decision contexts, whereas weak cooperativity predetermines fracture of the group at any nontrivial choice. This mechanism points to the crucial importance of Collective logic collective culture (Aerts et al, 1994;Conte, 2002;Hofstede et al, 2010;Kennedy, 1998;Menon et al, 1999) which eventually will define thinking of the "global brain" and resulting activity of social organism (Gabrielan, 2019;Heylighen and Lenartowicz, 2017;Last, 2017;Milivojevi et al, 2015;Peters, 2020;Roth et al, 2017).…”

Section: Collective Intelligencementioning

confidence: 98%

“…In that way, both organizations have problems with recognizing complex contexts and producing an adequate collective action, cf. Last (2017). In both cases, individuals are impotent to affect large-scale processes which then are free to proceed in uncontrolled ways possibly harmful for the group.…”

Section: Example General Qualities Of Individual and Conformist Organizations Indicatedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Regimes of collective logic

Surov

Ignateva

Bazhenov

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The study aims to reveal regularities of collective decision in groups of varying cooperativity and to investigate the influence of individualism–collectivism cultural dimension on the emergence of collective behavioral entities. Design/methodology/approach An agent-based model of group behavior is used to simulate the logic of collective binary decisions defined by reaching a consensus threshold. The key parameter of the model is the cooperativity of interaction between individuals which locates the group in individualism–collectivism cultural dimension. The probabilities of collective decisions are measured as a function of individual preferences and the strength of cooperation between agents. Findings Strong, weak and middle point cooperativities of inter-individual interaction define three distinct regimes of collective decision logic, namely, individualism, conformism and criticality. The critical organization allows the group to generate coherent non-predetermined collective behavior in statistical agreement with individual preferences. Research limitations/implications Emergent collective behavior with coherent and nondeterministic decision-making can be modeled in an agent-based approach with local interaction between individuals tuned to a critical point. Variation of a single cooperativity parameter accounts for a continuous transition between organizations of the group inherent to inert matter and living systems. Social implications A new organization of social systems distinguished by internally relaxed relations and large-scale freedom is found beyond the traditional individualism–collectivism contraposition. This state is reached by tuning behavioral logic of individuals to a critical balance of individual and collective values. Originality/value Individualist, conformist and critical regimes of collective organization distinct in terms of integrity, complexity and determinism are recognized as universal organizational classes of nature spanning both inert and living systems. In particular, individualist and conformist regimes produce simple deterministic behavior typical for gases and solid bodies, whereas the critical organization generates complex nondeterministic behavior inherent to living organisms.

show abstract

Section: Collective Intelligencementioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Example General Qualities Of Individual and Conformist Organizations Indicatedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regimes of collective logic

Surov

Ignateva

Bazhenov

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[ 131,171,[178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185]] Cities Smart Cities are already changing our living environment.…”

Section: Inequalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ownership of some materials, such as rare earths, can lead to geo-strategic problems based on technology. [178,179,[226][227][228][229] We have detected some of the challenges to be addressed by our societies and have put forward proposals for future research, which could bring attention to and increase interest in sustainable development and related goals through the SDGs, as a working protocol for research on IoT applications to protect the health of people and their environments, as well as improve energy efficiency. Figure 7 shows a summary of the three proposals or challenges to be addressed in future research on IoT applications to healthcare and compliance with the SDGs.…”

Section: Partnershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Facilitate orderly, safe, regular, and responsible migration and mobility of people with planned and well-managed migration policies.•Encourage official development assistance and financial flows, including foreign direct investment, to states where the need is greatest.•To ensure that people everywhere have access to essential services and social protection, the UN has called for an extraordinary scale-up of international support and political commitment, including funding through the UN COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund, which aims to support low-and middle-income countries and vulnerable groups who are disproportionately bearing the socio-economic impacts of the pandemic. IoT Application Solutions[131,171,[178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185]:•There is no doubt that technology and its applications in all areas of society represent significant and essential progress. Under this objective, more egalitarian growth would lead the most vulnerable countries with the greatest needs in terms of entrepreneurship, business, health, education, and in general, in all areas, to gradually catch up with the most developed countries.•Societies will be empowered through training and the implementation of technological systems and their applications in companies, local businesses, e-commerce, etc.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of IoT in Healthcare: Keys to Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals

Verdejo-Espinosa

Ruiz

Mata

et al. 2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We live in complex times in the health, social, political, and energy spheres, and we must be aware of and implement new trends in intelligent social health systems powered by the Internet of Things (IoT). Sustainable development, energy efficiency, and public health are interrelated parameters that can transform a system or an environment for the benefit of people and the planet. The integration of sensors and smart devices should promote energy efficiency and ensure that sustainable development goals are met. This work is carried out according to a mixed approach, with a literature review and an analysis of the impact of the Sustainable Development Goals on the applications of the Internet of Things and smart systems. In the analysis of results, the following questions are answered about these systems and applications: a) Are IoT applications key to the improvement of people’s health and the environment? b) Are there research and case studies implemented in cities or territories that demonstrate the effectiveness of IoT applications and their benefits to public health? c) What sustainable development indicators and objectives can be assessed in the applications and projects analyzed?

show abstract

References

2021

Platform and Collective Intelligence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global Commons in the Global Brain

Cited by 21 publications

References 7 publications

Regimes of collective logic

Regimes of collective logic

Application of IoT in Healthcare: Keys to Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals

References

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About