2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00101-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global constraints for round robin tournament scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This naïvety was due to the use of the term "round-robin" for these schedules, leading us to believe that we could use some of the models already in the literature [7,6,1]. This naïvety slowly dissolved as we addressed more and more of the ISAF criteria.…”
Section: Flightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This naïvety was due to the use of the term "round-robin" for these schedules, leading us to believe that we could use some of the models already in the literature [7,6,1]. This naïvety slowly dissolved as we addressed more and more of the ISAF criteria.…”
Section: Flightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other values of n, the best known results are by Anderson (1999). Henz, Müller & Thiel (2004) and Miyashiro & Matsui (2006) also tackle this problem, but without improving on the results by Anderson. Recently, Guedes & Ribeiro (2009) presented a weighted variant of the carry-over effects value, taking into account the relative strengths of the teams, and developed a heuristic for the problem to produce a schedule that minimizes this measure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, it is also shown how the classical alldiff constraint plus some additional constraints can be useful to solve the original problem. The comparison between this approach, the symmetric alldiff constraint, and the alldiff constraint has been carried out by (Henz et al, 2003).…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%