2012
DOI: 10.5194/se-3-199-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global distribution of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary: a new look

Abstract: New global maps of the depth to the boundary between the lithosphere and the asthenosphere are presented. The maps are based on updated global databases for heat flow and crustal structure. For continental regions the estimates of lithospheric thickness are based on determinations of subcrustal heat flow, after corrections for contributions of radiogenic heat in crustal layers. For oceanic regions the estimates of lithospheric thickness are based on the newly proposed finite half-space (FHS) model. Unlike the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of 18 mW/ m 2 has been found to be the best-fitting average Moho heat flow for these regions (Jaupart & Mareschal, 2007). However, the study by Hamza & Vieira (2012) shows a much higher mantle heat flow, varying from 20-40 mW/ m 2 on continents to more than 40 mW/m 2 in offshore areas ( fig. 7 in Hamza & Vieira, 2012).…”
Section: Mantle Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of 18 mW/ m 2 has been found to be the best-fitting average Moho heat flow for these regions (Jaupart & Mareschal, 2007). However, the study by Hamza & Vieira (2012) shows a much higher mantle heat flow, varying from 20-40 mW/ m 2 on continents to more than 40 mW/m 2 in offshore areas ( fig. 7 in Hamza & Vieira, 2012).…”
Section: Mantle Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the study by Hamza & Vieira (2012) shows a much higher mantle heat flow, varying from 20-40 mW/ m 2 on continents to more than 40 mW/m 2 in offshore areas ( fig. 7 in Hamza & Vieira, 2012). According to Turcotte & Schubert (2002), the average continental mantle heat flow is 28 mW/m 2 , and according to Allen & Allen (2013) it is 30 mW/m 2 .…”
Section: Mantle Heat Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness according to Hamza and Vieira (2012) has a pronounced peak of 280 km in Poland and also shows decreasing values from east to west with no distinct change in the gradient except a kind of plateau with about 180 km in northwestern Denmark. Except the decrease in lithospheric thickness from east to west, there is no other similar feature when compared to our GIA-model results.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…(e) Estimates to the depth of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB). Contoured are those of the spherical harmonic model of Hamza and Vieira (2012), and the circles are those of Artemieva (2006), both based on thermal arguments (depth to 1300°C from Artemieva's model TC1). The diamonds are the petrologically derived ones of Snyder and Grütter (2010) based on analyses of xenoliths brought to the surface in kimberlites.…”
Section: Lithosphere-asthenosphere Depth Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2e. The contoured LAB depth estimates for Canada come from the spherical harmonic global model of Hamza and Vieira (2012) (Perry et al 2010, andpersonal communication, 2013) (squares). The SHF data were contoured using GMT Smith 1991, 1998) Gripp and Gordon's (2002) model (red arrows), from GPS (blue and green arrows) and DORIS (black arrows) observations (see text for details).…”
Section: Lithosphere-asthenosphere Depth Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%