Global Environmental Law: Food Safety &amp; China

Czarnezki, Jason J.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2133551

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main goal was to form a sustainable growth of the agroindustrial sector by 3% per year. To do this, it is necessary that state support for the industry amounts to 900 billion rubles, but, according to the plans, financing of the agro-industrial complex will be reduced compared to the volume of the previous year [5].…”

Section: Results Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal regulation of financial support for agricultural producers

Barashyan

2023

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article is on the topic “Legal regulation of relations in the field of agricultural development”. The author analyzes the legal regulation in the field of agro-industrial in the Russian Federation. Agrarian legal relations include such features that must be taken into account when norm-setting activities in the field of agricultural development. The subject of the agro-industrial complex are enterprises engaged in the cultivation and sale of agricultural products. The objects of legal relations are related to the cultivation and processing of products, works and services that are performed in the course of economic activity. Agrarian policy, in combination with all other types of state policy, serves as an economic tool for ensuring food security, therefore requires the development of effective mechanisms for its implementation, analysis of the effectiveness of strategic planning and existing tools to support and stimulate the development of the agricultural sector. The author considered a new Strategy for the development of agriculture until 2030. We also analyzed the effectiveness of state financial support for 2023. It was concluded that the formation and implementation of state support tools for the development of the agro-industrial complex should take place on the basis of the developed conceptual foundations, it is necessary to activate the competitive advantages of all structural and functional components of the sector.

show abstract

Section: Results Of the Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Legal regulation of financial support for agricultural producers

Barashyan

2023

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is encouraging insofar as " [c]hanging what we eat and the way we eat will require significant and intentional modifications in individual behaviour." 164 However, in light of an ever-expanding population, small-scale voluntarism is clearly not enough to curb unsustainable levels of meat consumption. Notwithstanding a broader awareness of the myriad issues associated with the global food system, and despite a strong body of evidence indicating that eliminating meat from diets can lead to superior outcomes in terms of animal welfare, environmental [End Page 34] sustainability, social equity, and human health-causes that many people purport to care about-it is unlikely that the demand for animal products will abate under a business-as-usual scenario.…”

Section: Building a Just And Sustainable Infrastructure Of Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…170 The role of law and public policy is thus to "impact both structure and numbers and alleviate ground-level hindrances" to building new models and allowing for wider transformative changes. 171 For norms to effectively be leveraged to influence individual behaviour, there must be concomitant efforts at raising education and awareness as well as regulatory and market-based incentives and disincentives. As Jason Czarnezki puts it, "both informational regulation that helps influence consumer choice and structural changes that provide consumers with better access to better choices are necessary [End Page 35] for a sustainable food system to develop."…”

Section: Building a Just And Sustainable Infrastructure Of Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meat-ing Demand: Is In Vitro Meat a Pragmatic, Problematic, or Paradoxical Solution?

Lee¹

2018

Canadian Journal of Women and the Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Even in the midst of an ecological crisis, population and income continue to increase and so too does the global appetite for meat. One response by scientists has been to work towards making in vitro meat (IVM) a commercial reality, which would allow meat to be produced on a large scale without the husbandry and slaughter of enormous numbers of animals, as under the current industrial meat production system. Proponents of IVM technology claim that it could cut hunger, offer public health benefits, mitigate the environmental effects of conventional industrial meat production, and improve animal welfare. However, taking a critical, ecofeminist perspective on IVM highlights the need to assess not only the technical attributes and possibilities of the technology but also its underlying worldview as well as the unintended social and environmental consequences that could result. Reflecting on the question of whether IVM is a pragmatic, problematic, or paradoxical solution to the ills associated with industrial meat production and increasing meat consumption, this article argues that optimistic claims trumpeting the promissory potential of IVM are over-simplistic and warrant closer scrutiny. The importance of careful deliberation on the implications of emerging technologies like IVM cannot be understated because how the ethical discourse unfolds in the early stages will be significant in influencing public perception and social acceptance as well as shaping policy and regulatory design.

show abstract

“…First, this industry covers a large number of different industries -from fertilizers to finished food products. In agriculture, hazardous chemical and biological substances, technical devices are used, hazardous waste, greenhouse gases are produced [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

New trends in regulation of agriculture

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regulatory state agencies propose new solutions on regulating relationship in agriculture. Countries with developed agriculture have various national public institutions with a wide range of functions. They develop public policies, set standards, issue licenses and other permissions, do inspections, protect rights of agricultural products consumers, provide support to producers, and etc. Bodies regulating relationship in agriculture act in accordance with the general regulatory trends. Their activity is influenced by modernization and reformation processes, such as deregulation in various forms, transition from a command and control model of regulation to new models providing incentives for producers to voluntarily compliance, risk-based approach introduction, etc. Regulatory tools are often not effective enough for a number of reasons. This work consists of three parts, it evaluates the current state of agriculture in specific actual areas. The first section investigates general trends in the development of regulatory theory and practice. The second section deals with the problems of protecting farmers from unfair trade practices of suppliers and retail chains. The third section presents the results of the analysis of competing provisions on environmental protection and food safety. In conclusion, the authors give a system of new ways of regulation which can replace traditional ways of deterrence.

show abstract

Global Environmental Law: Food Safety & China

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Legal regulation of financial support for agricultural producers

Legal regulation of financial support for agricultural producers

Meat-ing Demand: Is In Vitro Meat a Pragmatic, Problematic, or Paradoxical Solution?

New trends in regulation of agriculture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About