2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
299
1
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 406 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
14
299
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the SEBAL model estimated ET is only 4% higher than ET from eddy covariance. Although the overestimation of ET by 3T model is higher than that of SEBAL model, it in no way suggests that SEBAL outperforms 3T owing to the fact that eddy covariance generally underestimates ET by 10-30% (Twine et al, 2000;Vinukollu et al, 2011).…”
Section: General Reliability Of the 3t Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…By contrast, the SEBAL model estimated ET is only 4% higher than ET from eddy covariance. Although the overestimation of ET by 3T model is higher than that of SEBAL model, it in no way suggests that SEBAL outperforms 3T owing to the fact that eddy covariance generally underestimates ET by 10-30% (Twine et al, 2000;Vinukollu et al, 2011).…”
Section: General Reliability Of the 3t Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recent advancements in satellite-based sensors offer great potential to monitor SM over large scales for continental water resources assessment, particularly in areas where ground observation networks are sparse (Mohanty et al, 2017). Conventionally, satellite observations have been used in global water balance studies to provide information on the water cycle components, such as precipitation, evapotranspiration, soil moisture, water storage and runoff (Running et al, 2004;Kiehl and Trenberth, 10 1997;Vinukollu et al, 2011;Trenberth et al, 2007). However, sparse data coverage in satellite observations limits their ability to provide spatially and temporally consistent time series of water balance estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. these important advancements, the current spatial resolution of these global scale studies is too coarse to provide locally relevant information (Wood et al, 2011, Bierkens et al, 2015. For example, predicting water cycle processes for scientific and applied assessment of the terrestrial water cycle requires a high-resolution modeling framework on the order of 10 0 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach leads to large and 15 usually unquantifiable uncertainties. As a result, gridded LSM evaluation products show considerable differences (Ershadi et al, 2014;Jiménez et al, 2011;McCabe et al, 2016 ;Michel et al, 2016;Vinukollu et al, 2011). If an accurate description of these uncertainties was available, then it might be possible to evaluate gridded LSM simulations in certain circumstances, but until now very few studies quantify LSM uncertainties at regional or global scales (Badgley et al, 2015;Loew et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%