Global health activists’ lessons on building social movements for Health for All

Abstract

Background: The People's Health Movement (PHM) was formed in 2000 and drew inspiration from the Alma Ata Declaration on Primary Health Care's 'Health for All' (1978). Since then PHM has been an active part of a global counter-hegemonic social movement. This study aimed to gain insights on social movement building, drawing on the successes and failures reported by activists over their experiences of working in the Health for All social movement to improve health, justice and equity. Methods: Qualitative research methods were employed in this study to capture complex and historical narratives of individual activists, through semi-structured interviews and subsequent thematic analysis of transcripts. The research design and analysis were informed by social movement theory and literature on health activism as a pathway for social change. In this study we examine the semi-structured interviews of 15 health activists who are part of the PHM, with the aim of deriving lessons for strengthening movements for Health for All. Results: This study locates the activists' narratives within a socio-political analysis of the global trends of late modern individualism and capitalist neoliberalism. This highlights the challenges faced by civil society groups mobilising collective action and building social movements for Health for All. The study found that within the constraints of the neoliberal socio-political and economic conditions which have caused the rise in social and health inequities, this group of long-term health activists have been nurturing alternative approaches to structuring society and building collective agency to improve health. Conclusion: The practical long-term experiences of the PHM activists examined in this study contribute to a better understanding of the processes and motivations that lead to and sustain health activism, and the dilemmas, strategies, impacts and achievements of such activism.

Are Pandemics Gender Neutral? Women's Health and COVID-19

“…Power dynamics granted women with lesser power in decision-making ( 30 , 31 ). Abortion is still not accessible in some countries as it is either criminalized or available in restricted circumstances.…”

Beyond political will: unpacking the drivers of (non) health reforms in sub-Saharan Africa

“…There are circumstances or windows of opportunity under which advocacy coalitions are likely to wield power. While global movements have been emphasised,126–129 we found that shifts to a democratised society provide a window of opportunity for citizens to push for reforms36 58 130 particularly if reforms are framed in a way that attracts previously marginalised groups or conflict expansion 131. That a shift to a democratic society underpins citizen participation in health underscores the role of institutions in enabling an advocacy driven policy change.…”

A critical interpretive synthesis of power and mistreatment of women in maternity care

“…Dialogical programs convene both service providers and service users, and seek to bring the experiences of the marginalized into mainstream discussion, such as stories about experiences of poor or discriminatory treatment by health providers [116,117,124]. This can be accomplished using various approaches, ranging from human rights education and conscientization to Participatory Action Research [125], developing political capabilities among those communities that disproportionately experience MoW [126], the utilization of formalized processes for civil society engagement in governmental priority setting and program evaluation [76], soliciting in-depth feedback from women following labour and delivery [74], and social accountability or legal empowerment approaches [127,128].…”