2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022gl101528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Nuclear Explosion Discrimination Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Louisa Barama,
Jesse Williams,
Andrew V. Newman
et al.

Abstract: Using P‐wave seismograms, we trained a seismic source classifier using a Convolutional Neural Network. We trained for three classes: earthquake P‐wave, underground nuclear explosion (UNE) P‐wave, and noise. With the current absence of nuclear testing by countries that have signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, high quality seismic data from UNEs is limited. Even with limited training data, our model can accurately characterize most events recorded at regional and teleseismic distances, finding over 95% sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the proposed method to several state-of-theart networks, including CapsNet [1], CNN [10], VGG [11], ResNet [11], GoogleNet [11], CNN [12], and CNN [13] with the same training and testing set. Table 1 shows the results of the GA-Net comparison with the benchmark networks.…”
Section: Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare the proposed method to several state-of-theart networks, including CapsNet [1], CNN [10], VGG [11], ResNet [11], GoogleNet [11], CNN [12], and CNN [13] with the same training and testing set. Table 1 shows the results of the GA-Net comparison with the benchmark networks.…”
Section: Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity Specificity ACC Paras CapsNet [1] 90.31% 80.43% 88.28% 40.32K CNN [10] 93.08% 90.04% 92.45% 1.36M VGG [11] 93.08% 66.19% 87.55% 11.37K ResNet [11] 98.61% 90.34% 96.85% 7.13M GoogleNet [11] 99.08% 91.10% 97.44% 5.12M CNN [12] 94.74% 89.68% 93.70% 5.20M CNN [13] 91…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%