2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Observing Needs in the Deep Ocean

Abstract: The deep ocean below 200 m water depth is the least observed, but largest habitat on our planet by volume and area. Over 150 years of exploration has revealed that this dynamic system provides critical climate regulation, houses a wealth of energy, mineral, and biological resources, and represents a vast repository of biological diversity. A long history of deep-ocean exploration and observation led to the initial concept for the Deep-Ocean Observing Strategy (DOOS), under the auspices of the Global Ocean Obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
155
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
(272 reference statements)
1
155
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, cold-water coral and fish distributions respond to small-scale variation in terrain, such as substrate type and seabed rugosity, as well as local oceanographic conditions such as food availability (Bennecke & Metaxas, 2017;De Clippele et al, 2017;Drazen et al, 2012;Rengstorf et al, 2013;Ross et al, 2015;White et al, 2005). We also recognize some limitations from the quantity, quality and spatial coverage of occurrence data, availability of absence records as well as some uncertainty in deepsea species identification (mostly for cold-water corals Incorporating these needs into the Deep Ocean Observing Strategy can help fill data gaps, and prioritize spatial locations for the collection of key physical and biogeochemical data (Canonico et al, 2019;Levin et al, 2019). As forward-looking international entities, This application is especially relevant for dramatic changes such as those projected here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cold-water coral and fish distributions respond to small-scale variation in terrain, such as substrate type and seabed rugosity, as well as local oceanographic conditions such as food availability (Bennecke & Metaxas, 2017;De Clippele et al, 2017;Drazen et al, 2012;Rengstorf et al, 2013;Ross et al, 2015;White et al, 2005). We also recognize some limitations from the quantity, quality and spatial coverage of occurrence data, availability of absence records as well as some uncertainty in deepsea species identification (mostly for cold-water corals Incorporating these needs into the Deep Ocean Observing Strategy can help fill data gaps, and prioritize spatial locations for the collection of key physical and biogeochemical data (Canonico et al, 2019;Levin et al, 2019). As forward-looking international entities, This application is especially relevant for dramatic changes such as those projected here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davies, Wisshak, Orr, & Roberts, ; Rengstorf, Yesson, Brown, & Grehan, ; Ross & Howell, ) have proven to be beneficial tools for improving knowledge of deep‐sea biodiversity, habitat presence, and distribution, and bringing with them progress in conservation action (as reflected in the evolution of the implementation of MPAs and fisheries management measures). However, there are still extensive gaps in fundamental knowledge of deep‐sea biodiversity and ecosystems, not only in the UK but on a global scale (Levin et al, ).…”
Section: Lessons Learned Challenges Encountered and Future Actions Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancement in deep-sea science can, and will continue to, be achieved through better communication and continued join-up between industry, government agencies, and the research community a view also held by Levin et al (2019) in their review of global observing needs for the deep sea. Data collected by industries to inform, for example, environmental impact assessments and compliance monitoring, can also be valuable for scientific research (Macreadie et al, 2018).…”
Section: Developments In Collaborative Research Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations