2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global optimization of benchmark aerodynamic cases using physics-based surrogate models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…SBO has been successfully applied in the aerospace engineering field [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In continuity with other works by the author [28][29][30][31], the present paper proposes an adaptive SBO framework for design optimization with different updating strategies and optimization algorithms. A sketch of the main building blocks is provided in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SBO has been successfully applied in the aerospace engineering field [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In continuity with other works by the author [28][29][30][31], the present paper proposes an adaptive SBO framework for design optimization with different updating strategies and optimization algorithms. A sketch of the main building blocks is provided in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Finally, while previous investigations focused only on aerodynamic optimization cases, here an extensive study is carried out on analytic test functions in order to quickly assess the performance of the algorithm on known data. The paper is structured as follows: the first section is devoted to the surrogate model definition and to the training methods; then, the sequential design by means of various infill criteria is discussed and some examples on a basic test function are proposed; furthermore, having introduced all the computational pieces, the whole surrogate-based sequential optimization algorithm is described in detail and interactions between subphases are highlighted; finally, the experimental test campaign on multidimensional scalable test functions is discussed as well as the results obtained by using different setups; an example of real-world application is given in the very final section where a benchmark aerodynamic shape optimization case is faced and results are compared with a previous work by the same author [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marco Ceze of the University of Michigan studied the characteristics of CST parameterization and found that the ill-conditioning of parameterization when fitting airfoil with high-order Bernstein polynomials [8]. Straathof et al proposed a parameterization method that used a combination of Bernstein polynomials and B-splines to allow for both the local and global control of a shape, which is an extension to the Class-Shape-Transformation Method [9].Currently, for 3D wing geometries, the CST methodology is being widely used to drive aerodynamic optimization problems by using a full potential panel code, where the Euler solver being used for 2D airfoil optimizations [10][11][12][13].Moreover, in terms of structural optimization, plenty of research has been made, and various optimization strategies have been proposed. Presently, the surrogate model technique is promising due to the excellent computational accuracy and efficiency, especially for the practical engineering system with complex mapping functions [14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marco Ceze of the University of Michigan studied the characteristics of CST parameterization and found that the ill-conditioning of parameterization when fitting airfoil with high-order Bernstein polynomials [8]. Straathof et al proposed a parameterization method that used a combination of Bernstein polynomials and B-splines to allow for both the local and global control of a shape, which is an extension to the Class-Shape-Transformation Method [9].Currently, for 3D wing geometries, the CST methodology is being widely used to drive aerodynamic optimization problems by using a full potential panel code, where the Euler solver being used for 2D airfoil optimizations [10][11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the AIAA Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group (ADODG) a was formed. As part of this, a number of inviscid and viscous aerofoil and wing benchmark optimization cases were suggested, with a number of research groups presenting results; see [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%