2010
DOI: 10.1038/nature09268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global phytoplankton decline over the past century

Abstract: In the oceans, ubiquitous microscopic phototrophs (phytoplankton) account for approximately half the production of organic matter on Earth. Analyses of satellite-derived phytoplankton concentration (available since 1979) have suggested decadal-scale fluctuations linked to climate forcing, but the length of this record is insufficient to resolve longer-term trends. Here we combine available ocean transparency measurements and in situ chlorophyll observations to estimate the time dependence of phytoplankton biom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
815
12
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,089 publications
(868 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
37
815
12
4
Order By: Relevance
“…While climate-related phenological shifts toward earlier spring events are widespread across marine and freshwater habitats (Thackeray et al 2010), there is less consensus on bloom magnitude (Adrian et al 1999;Boyce et al 2010;Straile 2002;Taucher and Oschlies 2011). Our analysis confirms the general shift toward earlier blooms at increased temperature and supports predictions that the effects of climate change on plankton production will vary among sites, depending on resource limitation and species composition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…While climate-related phenological shifts toward earlier spring events are widespread across marine and freshwater habitats (Thackeray et al 2010), there is less consensus on bloom magnitude (Adrian et al 1999;Boyce et al 2010;Straile 2002;Taucher and Oschlies 2011). Our analysis confirms the general shift toward earlier blooms at increased temperature and supports predictions that the effects of climate change on plankton production will vary among sites, depending on resource limitation and species composition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…One imaginable (if oversimplified) example of a biosphere extinction scenario is the depletion of atmospheric oxygen caused by the loss of photosynthesis in ocean phytoplankton and rain forests, possibly accelerated by rising global temperatures. Such a process may already be in progress (Boyce et al 2010;Roxy et al 2016). The (complete) extinction of aerobic life would reset the evolutionary clock back to the time photosynthetic oxygen first appeared in the atmosphere &2.5 Gyr ago, leaving insufficient time for the evolution of another technological species.…”
Section: Rapidity Of the Evolution Of Our Technological Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth of California Current rockfish was related to the PDO at the basin scale and to SST, SSHa, and freshwater discharge at the local scale. In the California Current, cooler conditions NORTHEAST PACIFIC NEARSHORE PRODUCTION were previously linked to increases in pelagic production, including rockfish growth (Lenarz et al 1995;Black 2009), rockfish condition (Lenarz and Wyllie Echeverria 1986), salmon catch (Hare et al 1999), reproductive success of the common murre Uria aalge (Gladics et al 2015) and Cassin's auklet Ptychoramphus aleuticus Wolf et al 2009), forage fish abundance (Sydeman et al 2013), zooplankton biomass and species composition (Peterson and Schwing 2003;Keister et al 2011;Di Lorenzo et al 2013), and chlorophyll-a concentrations (Harris et al 2009;Boyce et al 2010). These previous results are consistent with our findings.…”
Section: Black Rockfish In the California Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooler conditions and decreased water column stability associated with coastal upwelling indicate greater vertical mixing and nutrient availability to primary producers in the California Current (Chavez and MessiĂ© 2009;Demarcq 2009). Increases in nutrient availability cause bottom-up increases in phytoplankton and zooplankton abundances and subsequent increases in forage fish consumption (Peterson and Schwing 2003;Harris et al 2009;Boyce et al 2010;Keister et al 2011), condition (Astthorsson and Gislason 1998;Robards et al 2002;Takahashi et al 2012), and abundance (Hedd et al 2006;Thayer et al 2008;Sydeman et al 2013). Furthermore, cooler conditions can prompt favorable shifts in prey composition (Hedd et al 2006;Mackas et al 2007;Thayer et al 2008;Keister et al 2011;Gladics et al 2015).…”
Section: Black Rockfish In the California Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%