2014
DOI: 10.1126/science.1249213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global rates of marine sulfate reduction and implications for sub–sea-floor metabolic activities

Abstract: authors contributed equally to this work.Sulfate reduction is a globally important yet poorly quantified redox process in marine sediments. We developed an artificial neural network trained with 199 sulfate profiles, constrained with geomorphological and geochemical maps to estimate global sulfate reduction rate distributions. Globally, 11.3 Tmol sulfate are reduced yearly, ~15% of previous estimates, accounting for the oxidation of 12-29% of the organic carbon flux to the sea floor. Combined with global cell … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
196
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
196
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main driver of the marine sedimentary sulfur cycle is the microbial reduction of sulfate (e.g., Goldhaber and Kaplan, 1974;Froelich et al, 1979;Jørgensen, 1982;Bowles et al, 2014). The two major catabolic microbial sulfate reduction pathways are organoclastic sulfate reduction and sulfate reduction coupled to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM); both processes release hydrogen sulfide to the pore water (e.g., Goldhaber and Kaplan, 1974;Jørgensen, 1982;Hoehler et al, 1994;Boetius et al, 2000).…”
Section: Sulfur Cycling In Marine Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main driver of the marine sedimentary sulfur cycle is the microbial reduction of sulfate (e.g., Goldhaber and Kaplan, 1974;Froelich et al, 1979;Jørgensen, 1982;Bowles et al, 2014). The two major catabolic microbial sulfate reduction pathways are organoclastic sulfate reduction and sulfate reduction coupled to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM); both processes release hydrogen sulfide to the pore water (e.g., Goldhaber and Kaplan, 1974;Jørgensen, 1982;Hoehler et al, 1994;Boetius et al, 2000).…”
Section: Sulfur Cycling In Marine Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, aerobic metabolism dominates the organic matter mineralization in deep-sea sediments that are characterized by low organic matter content (Jahnke et al, 1982;Glud, 2008), especially in organic-carbon-starved deep-sea sediments with low sedimentation rates (Mewes et al, 2014D'Hondt et al, 2015;Mogollón et al, 2016). In contrast, owing to high sulfate concentrations in marine sediment, sulfate reduction might account for up to 50 % of total carbon oxidation in continental margins with high organic matter flux (Jørgensen, 1982;Jørgensen and Kasten, 2006;Bowles et al, 2014). However, in sediments where manganese and iron oxides are abundant or rapidly recycled, microbial reduction of manganese and iron can be the dominant electron-accepting processes over sulfate reduction (Sørensen and Jørgensen, 1987;Aller, 1990;Canfield et al, 1993b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In organic-rich fine-grained sediment such as in the Cretaceous WIS, the Zone of sulfate reduction would likely have extended only to within a few meters (\10 m) below the sediment-water interface (Bowles et al 2014). Thus, reaction (1) proceeds in the ''sulfate-methane transition Zone,'' in which both reactants are present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%