Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundPreterm birth is the leading cause of death in children younger than 5 years worldwide. Although preterm survival rates have increased in high-income countries, preterm newborns still die because of a lack of adequate newborn care in many low-income and middle-income countries. We estimated global, regional, and national rates of preterm birth in 2014, with trends over time for some selected countries.MethodsWe systematically searched for data on preterm birth for 194 WHO Member States from 1990 to 2014 in databases of national civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS). We also searched for population-representative surveys and research studies for countries with no or limited CRVS data. For 38 countries with high-quality data for preterm births in 2014, data are reported directly. For countries with at least three data points between 1990 and 2014, we used a linear mixed regression model to estimate preterm birth rates. We also calculated regional and global estimates of preterm birth for 2014.FindingsWe identified 1241 data points across 107 countries. The estimated global preterm birth rate for 2014 was 10·6% (uncertainty interval 9·0–12·0), equating to an estimated 14·84 million (12·65 million–16·73 million) live preterm births in 2014. 12· 0 million (81·1%) of these preterm births occurred in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Regional preterm birth rates for 2014 ranged from 13·4% (6·3–30·9) in North Africa to 8·7% (6·3–13·3) in Europe. India, China, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and Indonesia accounted for 57·9 million (41×4%) of 139·9 million livebirths and 6·6 million (44×6%) of preterm births globally in 2014. Of the 38 countries with high-quality data, preterm birth rates have increased since 2000 in 26 countries and decreased in 12 countries. Globally, we estimated that the preterm birth rate was 9×8% (8×3–10×9) in 2000, and 10×6% (9×0–12×0) in 2014.InterpretationPreterm birth remains a crucial issue in child mortality and improving quality of maternal and newborn care. To better understand the epidemiology of preterm birth, the quality and volume of data needs to be improved, including standardisation of definitions, measurement, and reporting.FundingWHO and the March of Dimes.

Respiratory syncytial virus acute respiratory infection‐associated hospitalizations in preterm Mexican infants: A cohort study

“…However, the relative contributions of specific pathogens and underlying conditions to severe cases of ARI have not been defined. Preterm born infants, which constitute 10.6% of all births globally, have a higher risk for severe ARI than infants born at term . In addition, infants with complications secondary to prematurity, particularly BPD, have the highest risk for severe infection and mortality.…”

Review of the evidence regarding the use of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation in low‐ and middle‐income countries

“…A 2018 review, assessing data from National Registries, Reproductive Health Surveys and published studies, estimated that in 2014, 14.84 million babies, or 10.6% of live births, were born preterm worldwide. More than 80% of preterm babies were born in Asia (7.8 million, or 10.4% of live births) and Sub‐Saharan Africa (4.2 million, or 12.0% of live births) …”

Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived from Umbilical Cord in the Study of Preterm Birth

“…[1] Preterm birth brings long-term health issues, including developmental delay, vision and hearing loss, chronic lung disease, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, such as cerebral palsy. [1] Preterm birth brings long-term health issues, including developmental delay, vision and hearing loss, chronic lung disease, and neurodevelopmental disabilities, such as cerebral palsy.…”