Intervention or interference? The need for expectant care throughout normal labour IntroductionAlthough healthcare professionals talk about the "stages" of labour, this is a medical label, not a definition that women recognise. To them, and in physiology, labour is a continuum, a state of being that changes, develops and transforms women into mothers, both physically and emotionally. One cannot, therefore, focus on intervening or modifying care in any part of pregnancy and labour without looking at its effects on all other aspects. Any action we take has consequences far beyond the intended effect on that particular 'stage' of labour, so any intervention we introduce (either medico-technical or more 'natural') must be for a good reason, based on sound research evidence and resulting in more good than harm, otherwise it is just interference.The objective of this paper is to describe and evaluate some common medicotechnical interventions in normal pregnancy or labour and critique their usefulness in terms of overall effects on women and neonates. There are many interventions used in modern maternity care, but three are chosen for special focus: induction of labour, episiotomy and active management of the third stage of labour (including early clamping of the cord). These three have been chosen for particular discussion as they are the most invasive of procedures conducted in the first (or pre-labour), second and third stages of labour, respectively.
Method
3A comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken to seek evidence of the benefits and adverse effects of three routine interventions. PubMed and the Cochrane databases were searched using the three interventions as search terms.Reviews and randomised trial results were given priority. The findings are presented firstly as background information on each intervention, and then as focused information on how to avoid using the intervention as interference.