2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/abc596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global weak solutions to a Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard system with chemotaxis and singular potential

Abstract: We analyze a diffuse interface model that describes the dynamics of incompressible two-phase flows with chemotaxis effect. The PDE system couples the Navier-Stokes equations for the fluid velocity, a convective Cahn-Hilliard equation for the phase field variable with an advection-diffusion-reaction equation for the nutrient density. In the analysis, we consider a singular (e.g., logarithmic type) potential in the Cahn-Hilliard equation and prove the existence of global weak solutions in both two and three dime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We deduce from Poincaré–Wirtinger inequality () and (), (), and () that rightσleftσχφ+χφrightleftCP(σχφ)+|Ω||σχφtrue‾|+χφrightleftCP(σχφ)+C1, where the constant C 1 > 0 only depends on χ,0.1emnormalΩ,0.1emfalse|trueσ0false|. Again by (), we have (see He 31 , (3.32)) rightΩ12|σ|2+χσ(1φ)dxleftΩ12|σ|22|χ||σ|dxrightleft14σ24χ2|Ω|, which implies that scriptEfalse(tfalse) is indeed bounded from below. Next, we recall the following inequality due to (H1) (see, e.g., Giorgini et al 9 ): normalΨfalse(rfalse)…”
Section: Global Weak Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We deduce from Poincaré–Wirtinger inequality () and (), (), and () that rightσleftσχφ+χφrightleftCP(σχφ)+|Ω||σχφtrue‾|+χφrightleftCP(σχφ)+C1, where the constant C 1 > 0 only depends on χ,0.1emnormalΩ,0.1emfalse|trueσ0false|. Again by (), we have (see He 31 , (3.32)) rightΩ12|σ|2+χσ(1φ)dxleftΩ12|σ|22|χ||σ|dxrightleft14σ24χ2|Ω|, which implies that scriptEfalse(tfalse) is indeed bounded from below. Next, we recall the following inequality due to (H1) (see, e.g., Giorgini et al 9 ): normalΨfalse(rfalse)…”
Section: Global Weak Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Multiplying () with −Δ φ and integrating over Ω, we have (see, e.g., He 31 , Section 3.2.1 ). rightA(Ψ(φ)φ,φ)+BΔφ2leftμφ+|χ|σφ+ϵ(tφ,Δφ)rightleftC(μ+σ+tφ2)+B2Δφ2. …”
Section: Global Weak Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For every κ ∈ (0, a 0 ), the regularized problem (3.2)-(3.5) can be solved via a standard Galerkin scheme like in [12]. Then following the arguments in [22,Appendix], one can derive uniform estimates of the approximate solutions (ϕ κ , µ κ , σ κ ) with respect to the parameter κ and time on a given interval [0, T ]. In particular, the additional viscous term ǫ∂ t ϕ κ in (3.3) yields some additional regularity on ∂ t ϕ κ such that ǫ∂ t ϕ κ ∈ L 2 (0, T ; L 2 (Ω)).…”
Section: Existencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, under suitable assumptions on the singular potential function Ψ and coefficients of the system, we show the existence and uniqueness of global weak solutions to problem (1.1a)-(1.3) on the whole interval [0, +∞) (see Theorem 2.1). The proof is based on a suitable Galerkin approximation that mainly follows the argument in [22] for a more general system with fluid interaction. Thanks to the singular potential, we are allowed to remove certain restricted assumptions on the coefficients A and χ when a regular potential was adopted (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%