2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/aaf513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global well-posedness and stability of constant equilibria in parabolic–elliptic chemotaxis systems without gradient sensing

Abstract: This paper deals with a Keller-Segel type parabolic-elliptic system involving nonlinear diffusion and chemotaxisin a smoothly bounded domain Ω ⊂ R n , n 1, under no-flux boundary conditions. The system contains a Fokker-Planck type diffusion with a motility functionThe global existence of the unique bounded classical solutions is established without smallness of the initial data neither the convexity of the domain when n 2, k > 0 or n 3, k < 2 n−2 . In addition, we find the conditions on parameters, k and ε, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
127
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
9
127
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The above result still holds true if one replaces assumption (A1) by the following Remark 2.3. Our result generalizes the corresponding boundedness result in [1] established for the simplified parabolic-elliptic system with special motility v −k with any k > 0 to more general functions satisfying (A0), (A1) and (A2), for example,…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The above result still holds true if one replaces assumption (A1) by the following Remark 2.3. Our result generalizes the corresponding boundedness result in [1] established for the simplified parabolic-elliptic system with special motility v −k with any k > 0 to more general functions satisfying (A0), (A1) and (A2), for example,…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…First, local existence and uniqueness of classical solutions to system (1.4) can be established by the standard fixed point argument and regularity theory for parabolic equations. Similar proof can be found in [1,Lemma 3.1] or [18, Lemma 2.1] and hence here we omit the detail here.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations