2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0501-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Globalization and the welfare state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Social expenditure tended to increase in high‐income (West) European countries and to decrease in low‐income (East) countries when globalisation was proceeding rapidly (Leibrecht, Klien, & Onaran, ; Onaran & Boesch, ; Onaran, Boesch, & Leibrecht, ). The globalisation‐induced effects also differed across welfare state regimes supporting the compensation effect in social democrat, conservative and Mediterranean welfare state regimes and the efficiency effect in liberal welfare state regimes (Yay & Aksoy, ).…”
Section: The Globalisation–welfare State Nexus: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social expenditure tended to increase in high‐income (West) European countries and to decrease in low‐income (East) countries when globalisation was proceeding rapidly (Leibrecht, Klien, & Onaran, ; Onaran & Boesch, ; Onaran, Boesch, & Leibrecht, ). The globalisation‐induced effects also differed across welfare state regimes supporting the compensation effect in social democrat, conservative and Mediterranean welfare state regimes and the efficiency effect in liberal welfare state regimes (Yay & Aksoy, ).…”
Section: The Globalisation–welfare State Nexus: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The empirical evidence on how globalisation influences tax rates and public (social) spending tends to support the compensation hypothesis rather than the race‐to‐the‐bottom hypothesis (Cameron, ; Dreher, Sturm, & Ursprung, ; Gaston & Rajaguru, 2013a,2013b; Gozgor & Ranjan, ; Gründler & Köllner, ; Herwartz & Theilen, ; Meinhard & Potrafke, ; Potrafke, ; Walter, ; Yay & Aksoy, ;—for surveys see Potrafke, ; Schulze & Ursprung, ; Ursprung, ) . Social expenditure has, for example, drastically increased in OECD countries and dominates fiscal policies—proceeding globalisation notwithstanding.…”
Section: The Globalisation–welfare State Nexus: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some include traits of the quality of human life or human well-being. For exploring the question of globalization and its sustainability, we have selected indices that characterize diverse aspects of sustainable development stated above, as well as an overall sustainable development index [36][37][38].…”
Section: Sustainability Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical evidence on how globalisation influences tax rates and public (social) spending tends to support the compensation hypothesis rather than the race-to-the-bottom hypothesis (Cameron 1978, Dreher et al 2008b, Potrafke 2009, Walter 2010, Meinhard and Potrafke 2012, Gaston and Rajaguru 2013aand 2013b, Herwartz and Theilen 2014, Gozgor and Ranjan 2017, Yay and Aksoy 2018, Gründler and Köllner 2018 -for surveys see Schulze and Ursprung 1999, Ursprung 2008, Potrafke 2015. Social expenditure has, for example, drastically increased in OECD countries and dominates fiscal policies -proceeding globalisation notwithstanding.…”
Section: Industrialised Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%